Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Videos
Random
Playlists
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Live Game Chat
NRL 2023 Round 18 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="StuBoot - Silvertails, post: 3532158, member: 13273"] Okay, so change it around a bit. He said he called Carrigan a c@nt not the ref. So Montoya gets 4 for calling a player a derogatory name but Walsh gets 3 because it's directed at the ref. Both words can be interpreted as an insult but one is deemed more powerful by itself (Montoya's) whereas the other is generally preceded by another descriptive term ( Walsh's). Said adjective is generally what makes it more direct and offensive. Walsh got lucky in a way that he just used the simple version, but that also went against him too because there was no specific indicator of who it was directed at plus most teammates wouldn't use that word to each other in a game, might call an opponent one but not a teammate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
Tim K
007
Big Del
Xzei
bb_gun
Bucking Beads
Foordy
Ondi
john1420
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
NRL Live Game Chat
NRL 2023 Round 18 Discussion
Top
AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.