But that's all I've done. Instead of cropping it at 12 years, I've cropped it back to 1995 which is when I first started working.He's taken off history prior, and hasn't removed enough to not make it a fair comparison. It's doesn't compare to what you've done, any suggestion otherwise is a stretch. Your example is purposely made to try and hide the finer details, Kimlo's simply removed a lot of history, likely because he can't comment on his own knowledge, because he wasn't here for it, or gone after the GFC to remove the data from that period, because it keeps being used as a way to stomp on Labor, when everyone knows the reality is, that period was very well done by Labor.
It comes back to the "good on paper" argument which the LNP loves. It only looks good on paper, because it doesn't give enough information about why, how, when, who or what was going on.
The graph I used had a % scale that went down to 2, whereas his started at 3.5, making the difference between the two parties seem much larger than it actually is.
Also, most importantly, you've completely ignored the flashing skull & crossbones, which is a massive indicator or "danger" or "death". It sits in the Labor portion of the graph.