CRICKET Queensland Bulls 22/23

[1910]

Credit where its due, this is really good bowling and this isn't Shield cricket.

Thanks- wondered why they were wearing coloured clothing. When your first three mates all nick off/caught behind the wicket and it's angling across you- leave it- runs will come later when you're still there.

Renshaw has looked patient and all hitting them in his area. They only needed 5 runs an over so there was no need to go nuts.

 

[Sproj]

Thanks- wondered why they were wearing coloured clothing. When your first three mates all nick off/caught behind the wicket and it's angling across you- leave it- runs will come later when you're still there.

Renshaw has looked patient and all hitting them in his area. They only needed 5 runs an over so there was no need to go nuts.

Oh right I forgot you are the only one who has ever watched cricket and has a right to an opinion.

 

[1910]

Oh right I forgot you are the only one who has ever watched cricket and has a right to an opinion.

No you're welcome to think rash reckless batting chasing a low total is the best game plan.

 

[1910]

Strange Renshaw is on 90 doing that very thing I called for.

 

[1910]

53 runs from 54 but three wickets left.
Renshaw all on his own.

 

[Sproj]

Strange Renshaw is on 90 doing that very thing I called for.

Strange he has also played and missed as much as everyone else too, almost like the bowling has been really good as well.

 

[1910]

Sandhu straight to the fielder- good batting. Apparently.

 

[Sproj]

Sandhu straight to the fielder- good batting. Apparently.

Almost like they need to chase runs in a limited number of balls.

 

[1910]

Almost like they need to chase runs in a limited number of balls.

27 off 24 to win and a guy on 99- you wouldn't knock it around and get him on strike? Sandhu is a much higher chance then Renshaw- you're right.

Crazy talk- number 8 hitting out and getting caught is much better.

 

[Unbreakable]

Batting Matthew

 

[1910]

That's the best of Renshaw's two Queensland 100's. Great batting.

Get him on strike!

 

[Sproj]

Renshaw lucky he was not given out pulling that ball and edging it through to the keeper. He definitely shouldn't be doing that with 25 to get off three overs, terrible batting, should be blocking and leaving apparently.

 

[Sproj]

27 off 24 to win and a guy on 99- you wouldn't knock it around and get him on strike? Sandhu is a much higher chance then Renshaw- you're right.

Crazy talk- number 8 hitting out and getting caught is much better.

A guy on 18 off 24 who has already hit a few fours shouldn't be going for it with 4 overs to go and three wickets in the shed?

 

[Sproj]

No idea how that isn't a wide.

 

[Unbreakable]

I know they're tail enders, but this is disgraceful batting for the most part.

How hard is it to get singles?

 

[1910]

I know they're tail enders, but this is disgraceful batting for the most part.

How hard is it to get singles?

Wooo no place for that here.

 

[Sproj]

Yeah almost like they had fallen behind a bit in the run-rate and needed to get it back on track.

 

[ZTop]

I know your pain @Sproj , I appreciate 1910s insight. But he certainly comes across as knowing everything and no one else knows jack crap