Search results

This is Pant, you have to review. Worth the risk.

I'm still shaking my head they omitted Jadeja, just nuts. This is like Billy Slater leaving out Fifita for some reason.

Ok nope, he's been given. I was going to say, it seemed a big edge that time, great ball by Marsh.

Here we go again I think.

Well done Marsh. Nice to not have Jadeja walking out.

There wasn't a clear gap, it could have been an edge and to be honest, the timing of the hot spot really does make it difficult to see what else it could have been. I don't know that the third umpire could really make any other decision without hot spot.

Controversial. Not sure what the noise was there.

Pant is their key wicket in my opinion. Always plays well in Aus and scores so quickly he can punish the opposition. Once he is set too, he usually goes on with it.

Which just makes it even stranger that they left out both Jadeja and Ashwin. Jurel looked ok in the A game though. Kohli looks like he is the same as late career Ponting now. Just holding on too long but still probably pull out a big innings here and there.

India are just not trying to score...at all. You've got to at least put some pressure back on the bowlers.

No Jadeja or Ashwin...what the heck??

They have Jaiswal, Pant and Jadeja who are all batting well. Sarfaraz also scored 150 like three innings ago. Jaiswal is amazing.

How is the Roosters' bid collapsing? What does that even mean?

I'm not dying on any hill, I'm simply saying if they can do it, there can't be any complaints from the media or anywhere really if we do it too. And for reference, the most like for like offer he received was what happened with Ben Hunt leaving us. We couldn't match it due to salary cap...Paps...

A broken down hasbeen...who is 26 and just played fullback in a grand final? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiightio then.

Roosters at 2? With Walker and Smith out most of the year and May gone, unless they get Hunt, they are in for a hard year.

Well after the Paps and Melbourne farce, the salary cap may as well not even matter anymore.

So basically, no one can complain if we keep our players or under of Penrith, etc. There is something very clearly going on that’s dodgy here but because Tripp is a massive figure in gambling, the NRL will just turn a blind eye.

Its 300k for one year. The Dogs were offering multiple years, so let's say for arguments' sake - 3 years. He's given up 900k to a million.

He also has an extensive injury history, to the point he almost had to retire. Saying no to multiple years at 1 million + to re-sign for 700k for one year, this is the bit that is massively suss.