Would have loved to bowl today, I reckon we could have had them 2 for not many.
Rohit has been struggling for a long time in red ball and Jaiswal after dropping 3 chances.. his confidence wouldn't be very high.
It's a hyperextension of his elbow, becoming a broken record having to keep saying this.
You expect the ICC to police who can and cannot hyperextend their elbow? It's not something you can just learn how to do.
He's no Cam Green but Labuschagne is a tall man. If it hits him above the knee roll and he's outside the popping crease, fair enough it's probably too high.
They've just got to pick a bat.
His bowling or lack thereof won't hurt us, it's killing us with the bat though. He's offered absolutely nothing. Not a single thing. I don't count his ability to catch a cricket ball as a contribution, that's just a basic fundamental expectation.
How's Kohli?
A father of 2 kids, captained his side, a deadset draw for every young player going around. Walks up to 19 year old Sam Konstas with no other intention but to drop a shoulder, fair dinkum. If that's not a flog, I don't know what is.
We bowled well but you always knew that Perth were going to have one guy get a few away and get them to 160 and with their bowling lineup on a big ground, they're always hard to beat.
Not much went our way with the bat either, Banton feathered one down legside, 2 direct hit runouts, a few dumb...
It's a bit ridiculous to even try and defend his actions. I don't even know how anyone can.
I think most who are feeling like 9 weeks is too much are those trying to compare this incident with another incident and for some reason it matters greatly to them. For me, he's lucky to even still have...
I doubt we see Milford as a mainstay in the NRL again, the elite halves are able to transition from being athletically gifted to being smarter between the ears. Milford never really made the transition and he's far from the lightfooted livewire he was when he came to us from Canberra.
The bit where you heavily insinuated he wasnt reckless or driving in a dangerous or speeding manner. You couldn't possibly know this unless you were there. It was a rhetorical question, we all know you weren't there but you seem to have knowledge like you were there. So no, it's not a fact. It's...
Were you there were you?
I find it slightly amusing you go on about focusing on facts when you throw out a few hypotheticals of your own.
Also the decision "might" be stupid? Try again, it is/was stupid.
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.