Search results

What happens with a passive defence. Who the **** is our defensive coach?

Helps to have a decent hooker

It takes years of consistent, quality coaching to get to this level. We are a long way from top 4 level

We'll never reach top 4 level of play without a quality hooker.

Waste of space in this company

Mam Cobbo Oates Special mention : Milf

and we got done by the Tigers. How embarrassing

I reckon Munster is terrific at FB which for mine is his best position. His defence is outstanding.

Wow. Absolutely! Get him in next week. He can teach Haas how to defend

For mine, We lost this game because the Roosters are a settled side (as Kevvie observed) and, importantly they have class in about every position. I see them as a genuine premiership threat, and coming good at the right time. Having the very best FB in the universe is a bit of a help. For mine...

At this rate yes

I'm starting to wonder if we can handle the pressure of a finals race. ATM, the answer to that seems to be no

No line speed. WTF? What's happened? Appalling defence. At this rate, Roosters by 30

For me one big issue is that there was no need for Patty to come in, with some momentum and tackle an effectively held player, held by 2 defenders in fact. It was totally unnecessary and that is what makes the tackle look so bad. 5 - 7.weeks. The fact he's a Bronco means it's curtains for Patty...

I thing I agree with you. Broncos by more than 29

Never really thought the NRL officials were corrupt but now I know better

YES !

Brooks looks so bored. I don't see why the Tigers want him.

One stupid mistake right on half time. Appalling play Pereira.

Niu is playing really well. Working well with Mam.