They’ve made it fancy this year, cool!
I have us coming 7th (27pts, 13-1-10), 1 point in front of the Panthers.
I just used auto-fill (which seems like the higher ranked teams always win), except for the game against the Panthers. If I’d left that alone, we’d be in 8th.
Mathematically possible!
FTA:
"Wayne will say, 'I want this person,' and Pete and I will go away and look at the numbers and work out what our ballpark is of what we can afford to offer. That's how it starts.
After watching the press conference, it sounds like Turpin in 9 next week (“will be in the team”) and SoS in 7 (mentioned by name, unprompted, twice).
Macca was described as “good”, but in the kind of context you’d use when you’re trying hard not to throw someone under a bus publicly.
Given what the Raiders have been through with sacking players, only to see them being registered to play for other Roosters, I’m not at all surprised that they’ve decided to err on the side of too lenient. I can’t blame them at all.
That article reminds me of my NSW loving mates back in 2009, when they were claiming that NSW were the “current SoO winners”, because they’d won the last game of the series.
Keep digging NSW!
Totally possible that Pay kept Klemmer on the bench to counter our change up, which as others have said, is a massive compliment.
I can't see the deliberate part though.
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.