To be fair, NRL360 weren't the ones suggesting it. They were merely reporting that the club was apparently considering trying it if Kafusi was found guilty.
Even Kent said it was one of the worst decisions in the history of world sport administration.
Where did I say someone shouldn't be allowed to bet until the card is verified?
I said as soon as practicable. I get that there is no ideal solution, either you end up punishing those doing nothing wrong to cater for those that are (some of which might not actually be attempting to "cheat" the...
Because if they haven't met the t&c's they are never going to be in a position to withdraw any net winnings, so why allow someone to keep betting?
Yeah I probably would, because it would be in my favour. Doesn't make it right.
I've signed up to a fair mount of bookies and have a reasonable understanding of how they work.
I'm not arguing about the t&c's or the legislation in regards to having to fund the account from a source in the account holders name, my point is if they really wanted to, they could change their...
Cheers.
No wonder a lot of people have dim views of bookmakers though. Hardly the most ethical of business to be in (not talking about individual workers, but the industry as a whole).
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.