Just on the Kahu deal, are we being forced to take him back because things didn't work out at his new club, or was this a special condition written into this specific deal. It's just that I've never heard of this happening before.
Anyone can see that there was not some crazy deal to get Gillette to stay at the club and get him to retire early,as was the case with Watmough. Isn't this ruling there to stamp out the rorts.
Clearly the guy would play till he's 100 if he could.
I guess most of us think you aren't in a position to make that judgement, all thing considered. Hey, you may be right. Haha what **** will you do if we have a successful year next year? I guess you'll just argue that it's not for some reason.
It's just that it's a relentlessly negative discussion that no one is interested in participating in any
I agree, and that's the point. We all loved the ice cream, but we have the cookies now.
I just don't see the point of constantly jabbing someone who is unaware of your actions. I'm interested to know what's in it for you? Or is it just to pissoff other posters?
You're really ramping it up ,have you ever asked yourself , " what's the point of posting this?" it must be really disappointing for you to really know what you want, but also know you'll never get it.