Search results

I would totally watch that show

Totally agree! I have it on very good authority that size doesn't matter :happy:

Indeed you may be spot on with his fitness, I'll make no argument there. However, that wasn't what we were talking about, the topic of discussion was his offloads......

Maybe he does, maybe he doesn't, but doesn't change the fact that on offloadless TPJ is not worth anything. If signed, the club would want to work on his offloads, not remove them completely.

The potential for Visa issues should have been the very first thing considered, so the clubs invited can make a decision based on all the facts. If DD was told the Broncos were being invited to play the Vegas round but might be without Haas and Walsh, it gives him the chance to say no thanks...

Surely we refuse to go if guys like Walsh and Haas can't get a Visa. A team can't be forced to play without some top players because the NRL is useless. It's a premiership game, there's 2 points on the line! I don't give a crap about what the Yanks get to see though, the entire idea is moronic.

Not that I want him at all, but if I did, it's the offload that makes him so dangerous. Perhaps it needs to be a bit more controlled in it's use, but an offloadless TPJ is not a TPJ I would consider signing.

Not being a smartarse, but I see a "huge lack of inexperience" as a really good thing OK, I am being a smartarse but it was fun :happy:

what does that mean?

If I was heading to the good ol US of A for some reason anyway, I would see if I could time it the same and go to the game. But there's no way I'd pay that kind of money, to fly halfway around the world, just to see a footy game. Plus I don't actually like the idea, I think it's another 'gem'...

And some fool on Zero Tackle has written an article defending it

Yeah, that's what I thought. And then, having lost our halves, the need changed. In some ways, it's less that we transitioned a 1 into a 6, and more that we transitioned half into a 1, and later moved him back.

I'd like for someone with more knowledge than me to answer this (or correct me) but my memory says 'no'. IIRC, Bennet has said the reason for Locky's switch to 6 was because we had Hunt knocking the door down to play 1, and we had a 1 who he believed could play 6 (I think maybe Locky played some...

Thanks for all the team write-ups @Sproj A lot of work for you, they all made great reads :)

I'll say what I said to my family.....Luai will improve the tigers. This isn't a comment on how good he is, but how bad the tigers are

I know! I pointed it out on the twitter post :)

Literally the only reason to watch Dolphins games in '24. This will be interesting.

Seriously, look at the man's track record, and you, the random internet troll, calls him dumb I have no words left

This is definitely what I'm hearing - trust in @Lazza

The guy wins you the most recent tournament, against Aus by a record margin..... Nah let's not work with him, instead issue him an ultimatum and lose him SMH