2010 Player Ratings

gUt

gUt

NRL Player
Mar 4, 2008
2,460
328
1. Josh Hoffman – 8/10. Superb year from a rookie in what is becoming the most important position in a rugby league team. Only a few of us called for him to start at fullback before the season began and continued to call for him after Norman had a couple of amazing games at fullback. This kid is a sensation and will hopefully be a Bronco for life.

2. Antonio Winterstein – 5/10. Could not really get going this season. Not many tries and looked shaky under the high ball. He should look like an absolute genius in the Cowboys backline.

3. Israel Folau – 7/10. A danger every time he got the ball. Scored plenty of tries and was always on the tip sheet of opposition coaches. Wonder why I am left with the impression that he didn’t get involved as much as he could have?

4. Alex Glenn – 7/10. Solid season from this classy kid playing out of position. In a team full of utility players he stands out as Mr Versatile. Hopefully we will see him playing in tight next season where he belongs

5. Jharal Yow Yeh – 6/10. Showed signs of potential and I’m left with the impression that he was our best winger but the stats say that Winterstein was an all round better player, apart from tries scored. This season will do him good and he should come back more sure of himself next season.

6. Darren Lockyer – 9/10. What needs to be said about this living football god? When he plays he doesn’t have to play a 9/10 game to have a 9/10 effect on the team. We all know what happens when he’s not around. Managed the impossible and somehow improved his game – he tackled better than I’ve seen.

7. Peter Wallace – 10/10. An absolutely blinding year from the best halfback in the game. Did not put a foot wrong all year and must have just missed out on the Dally M.

8. Shane Tronc – 7/10. Sometimes had the feeling that the big unit was playing a lone hand against opposition big men. Looks slow at times but then I remember he’s a prop and does not need to do the 100 in 12 seconds. He’s brought a good offload to the Brisbane pack that has been missing for a long time. With Hannant as a fellow bookend Tronc should lift.

9. Andrew McCullough – 7/10. Talk about a pressure job to be given to a youngster. McCullough is far from perfect – his passing game needs work – but to me he’s still the long-term answer at hooker for the Broncos. Defends well, can kick well, has a lethal show-and-go and was pretty much the only player to really lift in Lockyer’s absence.

10. Nick Kenny – 5/10. Don’t know what it is, maybe lingering injuries? Kenny did not have the impact that the Broncos needed. It’s like he needs to either bulk up or play a Michael Hodgson type of game.

11. Sam Thaiday – 9/10. Everyone knows this has been Sam’s break-out season. Looked fitter than ever, regularly played 80 minutes, was our go-to man in the forwards and was the default enforcer in our pack. Well done Sam.

12. Ben Te’o – 8/10. Perhaps the most improved player in the comp. Worked hard on his fitness in the offseason and when he was allowed to play in his natural backrow position he was devastating running wide into gaps or over the top of backs and also smashing everything that moved in defense. Great season from the surprise packet and let’s hope he can stay in the backrow for all of next season.

13. Corey Parker – 8/10. Never stopped trying to lift and lead his team. Still the hardest man in the Broncos pack to effectively tackle. I would like to see him do less grunt work early in sets but who am I to tell him how to play? Thanks for all your efforts in 2010 Coery.

14. Matt Gillett – 7/10. Boom rookie and find of the year. Another of Brisbane’s vast array of utility forwards who can run like a back over short distances and match it with the best opposition packs. If there’s not a starting spot in the pack he should be our first bench player picked every week.

15. Scott Anderson – 6/10. Tried hard but seemed to get overwhelmed a bit when opposition packs were on top. Adds value when Brisbane are on a roll but doesn’t seem to be a player who can manufacture that roll. Plenty of room for improvement.

16. Josh McGuire – 5/10. The Big Show did not get a lot of minutes but I feel he’s still being eased into the big time. Plays with plenty of passion but physically he’s not quite there – yet.

17. Ben Hunt – 7/10. Gets a 7 for his late season burst. Finally looks comfortable and competent in the top grade. His kicking game needs work and the experiment with him at hooker is hopefully over. Not that he was bad there but I think he’s not suited to it. I would like to see Hunt given the halfback spot with Wallace moved to the bench to cover hooker.

18. Corey Norman – 5/10. Gets a pass mark for his amazing early season performances at fullback but was exposed - especially in defense – in the halves. Corey has a long way to go to become a regular first grader but the potential is there.

19. Mitchell Dodds – 6/10. Apart from Gillett, Mitchell is the pick of the young forwards. Has a big shoulder on him and with another offseason should blossom into a good impact forward. Would benefit from Ben Te’o’s offseason fitness regime.

Ivan Henjack – 6/10. Made some baffling positional selections and stuck with them despite the evidence. Made some weird replacements during games too. But overall it has to be admitted that he’s done pretty well with such an inexperienced side so plagued by injuries. Rumours that the players aren’t happy with him are neither here nor there for me, what’s important is stability and continuity and I look forward to seeing what Ivan can do next year with this crop of young bloods he has developed.
 
the only players ill bother mentioning are the standouts this year for me:

Teo, Gillett, Folau, Lockyer, Tronc and Thaiday.

they stood out for good reasons. id give all of them 8+/10.

Kenny, McCullough, Hunt, Wallace and Parker.

they stood out for bad reasons. id give them all <4/10
 
Coxy said:
Hunt? Parker? Seriously?
seriously.

our play just dies in the @rse whenever parker gets the ball. he just goes side to side, doing nothing, and doesnt even offload when he has the chance.

Hunt, well apart from the last game or 2 he was very underwhelming.
 
Anonymous person said:
Coxy said:
Hunt? Parker? Seriously?
seriously.

our play just dies in the @rse whenever parker gets the ball. he just goes side to side, doing nothing, and doesnt even offload when he has the chance.

Hunt, well apart from the last game or 2 he was very underwhelming.

He's also not been given a chance to play week in, week out in his preferred position. When he has had a go in his preferred position (half or five-eight) he's been great.
 
Coxy said:
He's also not been given a chance to play week in, week out in his preferred position. When he has had a go in his preferred position (half or five-eight) he's been great.
im all in favour of just giving him the halfback position for the start of next season.

but from how he performed this year, out of position or not, he was underwhelming.
 
Parker has probably been our best player over the last 2-3 years. He's been awesome. One of the the most valuable members of our footy team.
 
gUt said:
1.

Ivan Henjack – 6/10. Made some baffling positional selections and stuck with them despite the evidence. Made some weird replacements during games too. But overall it has to be admitted that he’s done pretty well with such an inexperienced side so plagued by injuries. Rumours that the players aren’t happy with him are neither here nor there for me, what’s important is stability and continuity and I look forward to seeing what Ivan can do next year with this crop of young bloods he has developed.



Ah, where did Ivan play?

And why label Gillett as a "utility"?

Just because someone has skills to play in a number of positions doesn't mean he's a "utility". On that logic,T'eo is also a utility.
 
rnabokov said:
gUt said:
1.

Ivan Henjack – 6/10. Made some baffling positional selections and stuck with them despite the evidence. Made some weird replacements during games too. But overall it has to be admitted that he’s done pretty well with such an inexperienced side so plagued by injuries. Rumours that the players aren’t happy with him are neither here nor there for me, what’s important is stability and continuity and I look forward to seeing what Ivan can do next year with this crop of young bloods he has developed.



Ah, where did Ivan play?

And why label Gillett as a "utility"?

Just because someone has skills to play in a number of positions doesn't mean he's a "utility". On that logic,T'eo is also a utility.


[icon_shru
 
Hmmm...

You may have to excuse my rating system as it isn't like most. Anything from a 0-3 is bad, 4 is a mixed score, 5 is a solid score in that you belong BUT there isn't anything remotely great about you, 6 means you stand out but that's it, 7 means you're damn good, 8 means you can influence a result, 9 is exceptional and 10 is perfect.

1. Josh Hoffman - 7/10
2. Antonio Winterstein - 4/10
3. Alex Glenn - 5/10
4. Israel Folau - 8/10
5. Jharal Yow Yeh - 4/10
6. Darren Lockyer - 8/10
7. Peter Wallace - 4/10
8. Shane Tronc - 5/10
9. Andrew McCullough - 5/10
10. Nick Kenny - 4/10
11. Ben Te'o - 7/10
12. Sam Thaiday - 8/10
13. Corey Parker - 7/10

14. Ben Hunt - 5/10
15. Matt Gillett - 7/10
16. Mitchell Dodds - 4/10
17. Scott Anderson - 5/10

Josh McGuire - 5/10
Ashton Sims - 5/10
Lagi Setu - 5/10
Denan Kemp - 4/10
Mitch Rivett - 3/10
Gerard Beale - 3/10 (Although he did improve)
Dale Copley - 4/10
Corey Norman - 4/10
Michael Spence - 3/10
Dunamis Lui - 4/10
Steve Michaels - 3/10 (For us)
 
I like your scale Big Pete, but I think the fact you don't have anyone lower than 3 suggests a bit of kindness.

For instance, Rivett was a definite 0 for me. He did nothing. Ditto Michaels, at most a 1.
Dodds a 3, Wallace a 3.

Still, I like yours rather than say the RLW scoring system where if you have a horrible game they give you a 4. And if you're awesome they give you 8 or 9. And mostly give 6 or 7 for average games.
 
Y'see I disagree there on Rivett. He wasn't exactly bad he just wasn't up to grade. Same with Michaels really.

1-2's are reserved for players with hands like feet that contribute absolutely nothing to the team.

Like Carl Webb.

I stick by my scores for Dodds and Wallace. Dodds may not of contributed much in attack, but his d was awesome. Wallace wasn't exactly a liability, so I can't grade him lower than 4. He was still first grade material, he just wasn't playing good first grade football.
 
I find it hard to rate guys who played 2 or 3 games, I prefer to just rate the regulars.
 
Anonymous person said:
Coxy said:
Hunt? Parker? Seriously?
our play just dies in the @rse whenever parker gets the ball.

Same could be said for Izzy imo, 9/10 times he would try and run the ball himself no matter who was open either side of him. Very selfish player, but i guess that could also be due to the stupid "Give it to Izzy/Kick it to izzy" play Brisbane used on every set.
 
draggx said:
Anonymous person said:
Coxy said:
Hunt? Parker? Seriously?
our play just dies in the @rse whenever parker gets the ball.

Same could be said for Izzy imo, 9/10 times he would try and run the ball himself no matter who was open either side of him. Very selfish player, but i guess that could also be due to the stupid "Give it to Izzy/Kick it to izzy" play Brisbane used on every set.

Izzy hardly got the ball, we went left way too much IMO. Izzy struggles to throw the last pass though he takes it himself all the time
 
draggx said:
Anonymous person said:
Coxy said:
Hunt? Parker? Seriously?
our play just dies in the @rse whenever parker gets the ball.

Same could be said for Izzy imo, 9/10 times he would try and run the ball himself no matter who was open either side of him. Very selfish player, but i guess that could also be due to the stupid "Give it to Izzy/Kick it to izzy" play Brisbane used on every set.
20 tries in 20 games.....hard to say that the play dies when he gets it. Play stops cause he scores, but it doesn't die lol
 
Anonymous person said:
draggx said:
[quote="Anonymous person":2ebtywtm]
Coxy said:
Hunt? Parker? Seriously?
our play just dies in the @rse whenever parker gets the ball.

Same could be said for Izzy imo, 9/10 times he would try and run the ball himself no matter who was open either side of him. Very selfish player, but i guess that could also be due to the stupid "Give it to Izzy/Kick it to izzy" play Brisbane used on every set.
20 tries in 20 games.....hard to say that the play dies when he gets it. Play stops cause he scores, but it doesn't die lol[/quote:2ebtywtm]

Now because you have nothing better to i guess you will have no problem sitting down watching every match this year and letting me know how many times above those 20 he got the ball and did nothing but try and run thru 3 defenders whilst his winger or a second rower ran next to him with plenty of space.

On the 3rd or 4th and 10 out sweet go for it if that fails at least there is one more play to attack. However so many times he would try it on the 5th even if nothing was on.
 
Maybe because Izzy was always a winger
 

Active Now

  • Lostboy
  • Dash
  • Harry Sack
  • Fitzy
  • Hoof Hearted
  • whykickamoocow
  • Jedhead
  • TwoLeftFeet
  • Justwin
  • broncsgoat
  • PT42
  • Johnny92
  • Tmac
  • Skyblues87
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.