This is just nonsensical rambling. The relief for Gillett would have been higher if his salary was higher or the remainder of his contract was longer. That's circumstantial, nothing else.Yes. We have. And I have said this in previous posts, although Gilletts was nowhere near as blatantly obvious as burgess' or inglis'. And not to the tune of $2.5 million..... Souffs and possibly the roosters are the only teams that would get that, possibly Melbourne too if c Smith had coffee with greenberg..
I can't comment on the severity of Gillo's shoulder as I don't know anything about it, but he's got a serious history with his neck and it was clearly hampering him last season. I think objectively I could see why opposition fans would say that was a bit suspicious, but I'd say to those people the same thing I'd say to those who doubt Burgess etc: trust that the Doctors who actually make these decisions have acted with integrity. Their professional credentials and standing should justify that.