No I'm not. I choose to take circumstantial, testimonial and other evidence into account. In this case it weighs enough to remove my doubt.At the end of the day, you're still choosing one mans word over another. Remove the emotion, that's where we are at.
If this was a small timer with no backing, the money involved to secure your freedom is out of the reach of many.
I understand a court cannot do that because it's too difficult to write laws which can discern credible evidence from coincidental, malicious, or otherwise false evidence. It would have to be evaluated on a case to case basis...
I also believe there are too many technical loopholes criminals can skate through in our justice system, but I don't think it will ever be possible to punish every guilty person without innocents becoming collateral victims.