Because he was extremely shit at the "not much else".It seems funny over the last few years that the main concern of a half is apparently how well they defend, rather than how well the steer the team out create opportunities
If we wanted a half that was a great defender but not much else why did we get rid of Wallace?
Anyone who seriously wants Sandow playing for us has to be deluded. Sure he may do something flashy every one in a while but he is useless defensively and couldn't tackle my grandad. Defence is one our major problems and having a loose cannon, overpaid halfback who misses more tackles than anyone else isn't going to help.
No to Sandow