Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Videos
Random
Playlists
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Should Cronk be considered for immortal status?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Battler, post: 3083069, member: 8509"] No and neither should Slater, JT, GI, Gallen, or any other player from the 2000s who isn’t Cameron Smith, Darren Lockyer, or Andrew Johns. Edit: Johns’ best was untouchable. Locky was the best of all time in two positions (Slater being a better FB is a meme spread by people with recency bias). Smith was the clear best in his position and arguably the best player of all time. If JT becomes an immortal you have to also include Fittler, Alf, etc. The recent crop of inductees ruined the concept anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
Rowdy124
Old Mate
Wolfie
Harry Sack
Justwin
Brocko
Mick_Hancock
Brotherdu
Hurrijo
Xzei
Midean
broncos4life
Organix
GCBRONCO
dasherhalo
Sproj
Broncosarethebest
broncoscope
TonyTheJugoslav
Mister Wright
... and 12 more.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Should Cronk be considered for immortal status?
Top
AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.