No, because high altitude training is more demanding on the body and results in higher fitness when back to sea level performance...For all that high altitude football here in Australia?
eeehh - more than debatable. It's a bit gimmicky and working at high altitudes invokes different physiological responses compared to those observed at sea level. Unless you spend regular time at such heights there's a strong case that the benefits are negligible.
Having climbed Kilimanjaro, and being a bit of a sports nut at the time I can attest to the short term benefits of being at altitude. When I came back from Kili (where I was above 3000m altitude for 6 days), I was amazed how much easier I found Oztag games/training.
I spent 3 weeks at a similar altitude in the Andes last year (was up to 5000m for a few days). It's amazing how much harder on the body everything is at altitude. I would get puffed just walking up stairs. I thought it was just me being unfit after spending a week partying in vegas prior to heading to Sth America, but everyone else I was with, some of who were pretty fit guys, all noticed how much harder it is with less oxygen in the air.
You feel so much fitter coming back down to sea level, even if only mentally.
I'm by no means an expert in fitness, but people who are say that the effects are actually quite significant.
Truth be told, the body eventually adjusts back once the effects of oxygen richer air subside, so without regular training at heights, the benefit will vanish. Although there is really no way to know how long each individual will benefit. Fact is, they all do!
.