john1420
It's Bronco Time
Contributor
- Aug 27, 2008
- 2,799
- 3,946
First I want to be clear that I am not defending Melbourne - I hate Melbourne and will NEVER forget nor forgive what they did during the salary cap cheating years. Never.
With that said, the season is over and I am sitting home watching the 93 Prelim, Broncos V Dogs
While watching I made the point of noticing what stands out as particularly different to the game that's played now (I had ruck speed in reference to the wrestle in mind)
What I really noticed was;
1 - the ball was fed deeper into the scrums
2 - players actually played the ball with their foot, instead of waving at it
If I wasn't especially looking at the ruck I would not have noticed it as being different, so how different can it actually be?
What I did notice, only because I was paying particular attention, was the techniques employed in the tackle
Teams were still trying to slow down the play the ball back then, they just didn't use wrestling to do so
And I didn't notice any significant increase in play the ball speed
So if that's true, are we over reacting to the wrestle?
We speak of it as the biggest blight on the game, but is it really?
Or are we all jumping on the bandwagon because it's fashionable?
I have been following the Broncos since 92 and so I've seen plenty of footy, I'm far from ignorant of the game, but to be fair I don't know the game anywhere near as intimately as some of you guys on here
So I am interested in your opinions, particularly the opinions of the very knowledgeable folks, are we over reacting? Or am I missing something?
Put your Melbourne bias aside if you have one and ask yourself, is the wrestle really changing the fabric of our game? And when you answer that question, tell me :)
With that said, the season is over and I am sitting home watching the 93 Prelim, Broncos V Dogs
While watching I made the point of noticing what stands out as particularly different to the game that's played now (I had ruck speed in reference to the wrestle in mind)
What I really noticed was;
1 - the ball was fed deeper into the scrums
2 - players actually played the ball with their foot, instead of waving at it
If I wasn't especially looking at the ruck I would not have noticed it as being different, so how different can it actually be?
What I did notice, only because I was paying particular attention, was the techniques employed in the tackle
Teams were still trying to slow down the play the ball back then, they just didn't use wrestling to do so
And I didn't notice any significant increase in play the ball speed
So if that's true, are we over reacting to the wrestle?
We speak of it as the biggest blight on the game, but is it really?
Or are we all jumping on the bandwagon because it's fashionable?
I have been following the Broncos since 92 and so I've seen plenty of footy, I'm far from ignorant of the game, but to be fair I don't know the game anywhere near as intimately as some of you guys on here
So I am interested in your opinions, particularly the opinions of the very knowledgeable folks, are we over reacting? Or am I missing something?
Put your Melbourne bias aside if you have one and ask yourself, is the wrestle really changing the fabric of our game? And when you answer that question, tell me :)