CRICKET Third Test- Australia v South Africa

Agar showing what a terrible decision it was to pick him cause he can bat a little. FFS he's a bowler who isn't threatening in the slightest, sure pick him for the test team.... Genius!
 
Warner player of the series... what a joke... he made 213 runs across 4 innings and 200 of them came in one innings.

Should've been Smudge (231 runs 1x 100 & 1x 50), Head (211 runs 3x 50) or Cummins (12 wickets at 16).

If they gave Uzzie a couple more overs he would've outscored Warner as well and also got a double ton
 
Nothing against Agar as a person and certainly don't hold this test result against him given the circumstances...but the guy shouldn't be anywhere near the test side and never should have been.

If he goes on to deserve another shot through shield cricket then fair enough but until then, I don't want to see him in any test squad or XI.

He's not good enough.
 
I think we are forgetting Warner was an accomplished spinner when younger, and Renshaw has bowled some good offies.

Is he actually the worst bowling option in the side outside of the keeper and Usman?
 
The only upside to the Agar call is that hopefully it really was an India tour trial and he has failed.
 

Active Now

  • Mick_Hancock
  • cento
  • Skathen
  • TwoLeftFeet
  • Foordy
  • Hurrijo
  • bb_gun
  • Mustafur
  • Locky's Left Boot
  • Wild Horse
  • winslow_wong
  • Sproj
  • Brocko
  • Maddy
  • 007
  • Wolfie
  • lynx000
  • Morkel
  • Harry Sack
  • NSW stables
... and 9 more.
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.