S
subsbligh
NRL Captain
- Mar 16, 2008
- 3,270
- 857
BEGERK
I'll do it. I'll just needs some industry-sourced boundaries. Is the word "****wit" a commercially viable term when referring to refs?
Commercially, maybe not, but in terms of academia, you would be incorrect to call them anything but what is factual, and damn that is factual!
Seriously, how good would it be to be paid to stuff about with Google Glass at Broncos training and games, sponsored by the NRL... **** I wish I had thought of this two weeks ago instead of the bland old, "Social comparison on tangible interfaces to reduce energy consumption in low-income households".
Imagine a ref needing to review a try by simply voice activating direct control of camera angles and playback speed/frames, along with his own direct recording of his view, and the other ref's/touchy's viewpoints. It's gonna happen much like eagle eye did for cricket, it all comes down to who puts their hand up to work on it and make the cash. Then there's drone cameras. Gotta love technology.