I think it is panic as well, although I see it as thinking we need to score whenever there is an opportunity because we don't know or trust that we will be in that position again.
Well that's what I sense from Reynolds anyway... if he thought we were winning the yardage battle he wouldn't be panicked into going for 40/20's or running on the last 50m out.
Staggs and co seem to just think "score on every play", probably because he touches the ball so rarely that he thinks he needs to make an impact whenever he does touch it.
There's no willingness to just take their medicine and reset for the next play.
Edit: sorry this rant ended up being a really long one
Everyone who has played sport, especially social sport where there isn’t a coach to crack the whip, has experienced teammates who have a higher level ability than most the team or comp and then do really annoying shit like crab sideward and run backwards until they are cornered, they’ll chuck a rushed pass to someone not expecting it. They hold the ball for an impressive amount of time without being stopped thanks to their footwork and evasiveness, but 80% of the defensive line just stands and watches them step 20 times in all directions but forwards.
For me, I noticed it most in touch footy with the guys who were high school league stars. Their mentality was always “avoid being touched at all costs” rather than thinking “what is best for the team right now”. So they would do exactly what I described above. After them scoring 2 or 3 tries per game each but losing 4 games in a row, finally enough argument gets through to them that their footwork and speed would actually be really great at building momentum and getting quick play the balls by running straight, getting a quick touch, and now we are set up to attack a retreating defensive line.
Typically you’d then dominate the opposition, maybe even win a game or 2 but either they get bored with it, forget, or as soon as there is a tough opponent - they go straight back to the mentality of ‘I need to win this on my own’, which actually ****s the whole teams chances of winning.
The issue is, objectively if you watch those type of players, they are making line breaks, scoring tries, making some defenders look silly (without actually making any metres). So to them and outsiders, it looks like they just played another incredibly dominant game. How do you tell that guy that he’s the one who needs to change?
It’s why I was so against players like Isaako (at fullback) and TPJ. Yeah, at a surface level they look dominant but what looks like success for them is actually failing the team.
It’s hard to know which players are the biggest offenders without knowing the exact game plan. But for years Haas would grind out every possible metre without it seeming like he had any care for where on the field his run landed the PTB, or even the speed at which he played the ball. I think Haas has gotten a lot better and is far from our biggest problem but I think it really highlights how good someone can be playing individually while still undermining the team’s chances of winning. Patty is a bit of an offender for this too.
Shiba and Arthars are our only outside backs who seem to care about this at all. On field position kicks, the kicker is usually aiming to pin a team deep in their corner. Because a yardage set is harder if you can only pass it one direction. Last game there where so many sets where Cobbo, Mariner and Staggs kept running on the edges with no regard for getting the PTB back in the middle third - the only guy who does it regularly is Shibasaki. Watch him closely next game and see how many of his ones have a strategic mindset compared to the other guys.