Oh ok, no good points. You're right, legal representation has never been used in these incidents in the past. Crazy actually that the NRL had legal representation there themselves, they should have just got an ex-player in too. Funny though that said legal representation couldn't actually be bothered doing their job by actually, you know, cross examining the player as should happen in a court of law, which this was masquerading as. Almost like the decision was made before going into it hey.
I mean hey, why even have it in front of a judicial committee? Why go through with this process at all given what would anyone has not played the game know? And what on earth would legal representation know about legal proceedings right?
Hey here's a good one. Why do we even put serial killers on trial because what would non-serial killers even know about it right? Why even bother using legal counsel in a court of law, let's just let ex-serial killers judge serial killers. Ex-con artists judge con artists and so on.
Its crazy how stupid you constantly make yourself look. And please forgive me for giving you credit when it comes to basic points, my bad. We've made some improvement but there is still clearly a long way to go for you.