I'm a Kayo 1 screen subscriber. On top of following NRL, I also follow MotoGP and World Superbikes. And with the NRL, I don't have time to watch every game every week, but I watch the other 7 games Mini's. If I only followed NRL, and not the 2 bike series as well, I might be content with Ch 9...
I may have missed it but I don't think anyone said all insults are equal, although I think I may have been misinterpreted as saying that. It's not that they are equal but that they are all wrong.
Crimes, as you state, are a perfect example. Shoplifting is a crime. Murder is a crime. Both are...
"but to use it as a way to dilute the impact of what was said to Mam is disgusting"
I agree 100%, but just to be sure, I didn't do that, did I? If I did let me know where so I can explain it, because it certainly wasn't my intent :)
I don't buy the whole this type of comment is OK because this reason, and that isn't because of history, oppression, other reasons. Targeting someone's appearance to taunt them, put them off their game, make them feel bad, whatever - this behaviour is either OK or it isn't. 30 years ago it was...
I've got no time for 'the ref should put the whistle away' or the game 'should be reffed like the GF' or such comments. Every game should be reffed the same way, you know, to the rules. That's why they have rules. If you need the ref to look the other way so it's an open game, and the NRL wants...
Gotta ask.....is the issue being asked to wear a team/company polo, or any polo?
Because I live in polo shirts, most comfortable thing in the world, and I can't imagine what else I would choose to wear
What would @Nashy wear?
Definitely understand your point mate, if you've spoken to someone who was there, then that gives you evidence others don't have, and that may lead you to a different opinion.
I can only go ion what evidence I have, but I won't argue against your right to come to a different opinion as you have...
That's it right there, I'll never see the evidence of Adam's guilt, either because it won't be released or it doesn't exist. And in the absence of evidence, I'll assume his innocence. It's the way it is supposed to be.
I've seen no evidence that he did anything wrong, that's all I need.
I see your point in bold above, but I don't think that rises to the level of proving guilt. Putting the captain out there saying 'we' got it wrong even if 'he' personally didn't is leadership 101. It doesn't have to mean he is...
Without having a debate about your first point, anyone with a basic understanding of the English language knows that your comment is an opinion, not fact.