BHQ Gambling Association

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Finau and Bradley looking good so far.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Finau and Bradley looking good so far.

You'll probably regret those words come the end of the 2nd round.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

You'll probably regret those words come the end of the 2nd round.

No doubt at all lol

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

I blame you for Bradley's bad round!

Not convinced there's going to be a chance for a break tonight, but if there is Nieve @ 55 is the value. Uran @ 25 the value if the favs contest, think he's about twice what he should be.

Onto our game, Milford to score 2+ tries @ $15 looks tasty.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

I blame you for Bradley's bad round!

Not convinced there's going to be a chance for a break tonight, but if there is Nieve @ 55 is the value. Uran @ 25 the value if the favs contest, think he's about twice what he should be.

Onto our game, Milford to score 2+ tries @ $15 looks tasty.

And rightly so. I've got a little something on an outsider but don't want to say anything in case I jinx him. BTW, watch Weis win. I didn't place any bets, bar the FRL one in Ireland. I'll strangle the fucker if he does.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

$5 on Manly too which I'll be very happy to lose.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

No tips for the final stage [MENTION=1917]Ari Gold[/MENTION]?

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Nope, it's a sprint stage.

Roosters 1-12 looks a moral tomorrow though.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Got a nervous wait overnight. I'm on Curran, Blair and Finau who are still in it. Hoping Spieth has a screamer of a day as I backed him for event low round. On a number of other guys as well with no chance at the win but a shot at top 25.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Are you feeling the Tiger Ari? Me neither.

Not sure who I'll be backing for the actual win yet, but I'll keep the faith with Finau and Blair this week again.....and of course, Stefani.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

I rarely give Tiger a second thought these days. Frankly I kinda like it that way, it's annoying having to avoid his prowess each week.

I'm not really looking for a long odds winner this week (I still have a couple of selections, but it's not my go to angle). 14 of the last 22 and 16 of 29 overall winners have been major champions. Between them the 29 individual winners of this event have 476 PGA titles and 66 Majors. Granted Tiger and Nicklaus count for some of it, but you have names like Rose, Tom Watson, Furyk, Els, Singh, Norman and Azinger on the honor roll as well. It's a high calibre player that usually wins this event, so I'm avoiding the likes of Stefani and Finau here.

You're most likely going to get a winner at the top of the market and honestly think it may be Spieth. Kuchar's record here seems particularly strong as well.

As for those 2 longer shots, predictably they are Stallings (320) and Glover (750). Stallings almost won this a few years back and is 4/4 here with 3x Top 25. Winner of Torrey Pines, which I feel is a similar kind of test to Muirfield. Glover is a US Open winner so basically speaks for himself. Neither meet the seasonal form criteria mind you.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Kisner, Rose, Day and Koepka are what I've gone with. Plus various long shots for placings etc.

Not touching Keegan? Is the faith starting to fade? Don't worry, I won't be placing anymore bets so can't jinx you this week.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

I only have faith in Keegan on courses he's done well on.

Am on Uihlein though.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

All in on Weis this week Harry?

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

I always back the Berger.

So close with Rose this week. Took him as a saver at the last minute.

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

All in on Weis this week Harry?

Just checked the odds actually, at $6 no thanks.

Stefani will be getting some money from me this week that's for sure.

 

[Ari Gold]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Stefani has long been down in the book for this one but the odds available mean the stake won't be quite so high.

I actually have a really strong angle on the St Jude this week so have about 6 players I'm keen on, Stefani at 51s is easily the shortest of them!

 

[Harry Sack]

Re: BHQ Gambling Association - DO NOT LINK TO BETTING WEBSITES

Stefani has long been down in the book for this one but the odds available mean the stake won't be quite so high.

I actually have a really strong angle on the St Jude this week so have about 6 players I'm keen on, Stefani at 51s is easily the shortest of them!

Good stuff. Haven't really looked at much so far. Glover and Stallings would be 2 of them knowing you lol.

I'll be putting something on Ben Crane as a previous winner.