Big Del
State of Origin Rep
- Apr 22, 2017
- 5,481
- 6,316
-24 to - 205 is a pretty massive difference to me. Your maths needs some work too
Yep ! I went back and checked . Think I`m closer to the mark this time ?
-24 to - 205 is a pretty massive difference to me. Your maths needs some work too
Current defensive coachThanks Mc Hunt .
So this season we are averaging 14 for and 31 against .
Last season at the same stage we were 19 for and 19 + against .
Conceding 2 more tries . Scoring one less on average .
The SKY IS FALLING !!!!!
Wasn`t Steve Kearny Uncle Wayne`s defence coach ?
That's one way of putting it. Another would be to say we've had a 20% decrease in our score rate while letting in 60% more points against us. I don't know how else to say this - there's a very strong causal relationship between scoring more points than the opposition and winning. If we assume winning is one of the team's goals, scoring fewer points does not help fulfil that goal, allowing our opponents to score more points does not help achieve that goal, and scoring fewer points while conceding more definitely does not help us win games.Thanks Mc Hunt .
So this season we are averaging 14 for and 31 against .
Last season at the same stage we were 19 for and 19 + against .
Conceding 2 more tries . Scoring one less on average .
The SKY IS FALLING !!!!!
Wasn`t Steve Kearny Uncle Wayne`s defence coach ?
Whatever way you look at it though, the sky is pretty fucking low.That's one way of putting it. Another would be to say we've had a 20% decrease in our score rate while letting in 60% more points against us. I don't know how else to say this - there's a very strong causal relationship between scoring more points than the opposition and winning. If we assume winning is one of the team's goals, scoring fewer points does not help fulfil that goal, allowing our opponents to score more points does not help achieve that goal, and scoring fewer points while conceding more definitely does not help us win games.