I would say the most controversial selection was Folau. I could see somebody making a good case for either Roberts or Reed, but I don't think either of them touched what Folau was capable of in 2010.
Brisbane were a team of individuals and they relied heavily on Lockyer, Folau, Thaiday, Parker etc. to score points. After a horrific start, it was those players who took it upon themselves to come up with the big plays and that Lockyer/Folau combination almost lifted them to an unlikely finals place.
There was a game against St George, the Cyril Connell tribute match, where the gameplan was to kick for Folau. Bennett was onto it and had his players do everything to take him out of the contest, but he just wouldn't be denied.
Not only was he strong in the air, but his running game was fantastic too. I still recall a try he was involved in against Melbourne where he put on a fantastic step, sliced through and tore the game wide open.
Reed put more runs on the board and actually played on the left-hand side, so if this team was actually running out it would close the gap. I thought Reed was all heart and after playing every game like it was his last in 2011, he settled into being a solid player. I couldn't begrudge anyone going with Reed, but feel if we were picking the two based purely on their on-field ability, Folau edges him (and basically 99% of backs in the competition).
I spent the bulk of that previous thread discussing Roberts time at the Broncos so I won't go into as much detail. He was just an extremely enigmatic player and in those big games I often felt like he was an easy target (see the FW1 2017 final vs Sydney). Had more runs on the board and his speed would certainly provide a nice counter-point, but just wasn't as reliable as Folau. Lockyer and Roberts working in tandem is an exciting prospect.
There were a few players who could consider themselves unlucky. Te'o, Lodge, Blair all came close while Hoffman, Kahu, P. Wallace and Hannant could make a case.