CaptainHook
NRL Player
- Jun 17, 2013
- 2,990
- 1,303
Why do people keep bringing up the penalty? Had no impact on the result.
Just more tackling we didn't need to do. At that stage in the game it was crucial.
Why do people keep bringing up the penalty? Had no impact on the result.
Just more tackling we didn't need to do. At that stage in the game it was crucial.
Shouldn't act too surprised, it will find its way into a discussion of which brand of socks is best.
You've never been a forward have you....only a back would make those comments. lol
I played front row, second row and yes...One glorious game on the wing. But that was in the days of under 21 colts. I can't say I was much of a ball playing forward with the exception of offloads.
Unless you're exeptional, the bigger you are the harder it is move laterally in defence, and the harder it is to get back in line when your tired. Sure you can make the big metres, but as I say you usually tire more easily. Its what makes a bloke like gillet so good. He might not make the big runs of other 2nd rowers, but he just never seems to let up the physically. Same with Maguire but to a lesser degree, he's a prop.
There's a reason why the likes of fui fui moi moi and his like are limited in teams. You are right a big man, with the same engine as a smaller man will always win. But a player not out of puff will run rings around one who is and there's few big front rowers that can play 60 minutes, let alone 80. That's why smaller forwards exist.
Speaking of socks, did you see some of the players pulling their socks down during the GF? I know Parker hated that.
And the meters gained by the Cows as a consequence... let's not forget that.It was one extra tackle we had to make because it was conceded on the first tackle. Yeah, that made a huge difference.
Most of them are just lard arses.
I'm talk about big fit aggressive guys....they win matches.
Much harder with a small pack. Ask any Tigers supporter.
Ps if you asked any of the Broncos forwards if they'd like to be 6 inches taller and 10 kegs heavier (with the same athletic ability) you reckon any of them say 'no'.
Personally I wish the Broncos kept Wallace instead of Moose. He is a lot cheaper, and his output this season has been arguably better... Add to that Moose makes a few mistakes and gives away dumb penalties. I dunno, he sorta just annoys me. Looks like he would be a bit of an asshole haha. Wallace is always really nice and even gave a wave to some of the Broncos fans (myself included) when we versed the Titans. My main issue with Mcguire is his after contact metres... He makes decent metres before the line, but usually, once he hits a defender, he hits the floor. I think the after contact metres forwards make is a big thing in their impact. Players like Taumololo, Vaughn, JDB etc all make pretty good metres after hitting the line and it really gets the team on the front foot.
Personally I wish the Broncos kept Wallace instead of Moose. He is a lot cheaper, and his output this season has been arguably better... Add to that Moose makes a few mistakes and gives away dumb penalties. I dunno, he sorta just annoys me. Looks like he would be a bit of an asshole haha. Wallace is always really nice and even gave a wave to some of the Broncos fans (myself included) when we versed the Titans. My main issue with Mcguire is his after contact metres... He makes decent metres before the line, but usually, once he hits a defender, he hits the floor. I think the after contact metres forwards make is a big thing in their impact. Players like Taumololo, Vaughn, JDB etc all make pretty good metres after hitting the line and it really gets the team on the front foot.
It was one extra tackle we had to make because it was conceded on the first tackle. Yeah, that made a huge difference.
Would still prefer McGuire, he's putting up these numbers from the Lock position (He lost a bit of weight before the season so he could play longer and be more mobile), whilst he's not contributing as much as we'd like in the ball playing department, he's still far more valuable of a player than Wallace if you ask me.
McGuire - 63 mins, 16.9 runs, 157.1 metres, 37.4 tackles, 2.3 missed, 0.7 offloads.
Wallace - 58 mins, 15.4 runs, 146.5 metres, 32.6 tackles, 1.9 missed, 0.4 offloads.
What that does show is basically two things.
First - how good Wallace has been going. They are basically the same stats given minutes played and Wallace has had a few noticeable lifts in performance of late. The thing that puts him in my origin team is that he seems to lift against the better sides, just as he did for us in the 2015 GF, he was great that game and I think one of the things that started our whole discussion of whether he'd play origin, etc.
Second - McGuire is still basically playing as a prop, so put him back there.
Would still prefer McGuire, he's putting up these numbers from the Lock position (He lost a bit of weight before the season so he could play longer and be more mobile), whilst he's not contributing as much as we'd like in the ball playing department, he's still far more valuable of a player than Wallace if you ask me.
McGuire - 63 mins, 16.9 runs, 157.1 metres, 37.4 tackles, 2.3 missed, 0.7 offloads.
Wallace - 58 mins, 15.4 runs, 146.5 metres, 32.6 tackles, 1.9 missed, 0.4 offloads.