NOT CROSS FORUM NRL 2023 Round 18 Discussion

[Organix]

Annesley: "Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"

Graham Annesley explains the interpretations of charge down's and the difference between Wade Egan and DWZ's attempt to do so in the Warriors match against the South Sydney Rabbitohs

www.nrl.com

**** this guy. His clarification clarified nothing. Just says that the first "charge down" was the 9 attempting to cover the ball, when he clearly was tackling the player.

"Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"... what? Like, just get rid of the Bungler. If we were not putting every fucking thing under the microscope we would he forced to take a shit decision as just a decision and move on. Annesley justifying all this crap post-game just ***** the game and the rules further.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

Annesley: "Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"

Graham Annesley explains the interpretations of charge down's and the difference between Wade Egan and DWZ's attempt to do so in the Warriors match against the South Sydney Rabbitohs

www.nrl.com

**** this guy. His clarification clarified nothing. Just says that the first "charge down" was the 9 attempting to cover the ball, when he clearly was tackling the player.

"Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"... what? Like, just get rid of the Bungler. If we were not putting every fucking thing under the microscope we would he forced to take a shit decision as just a decision and move on. Annesley justifying all this crap post-game just ***** the game and the rules further.

I think the same. Get rid of his bs, get rid of the bunker overreach, just play the game

 

[Organix]

I think the same. Get rid of his bs, get rid of the bunker overreach, just play the game

your avatar

 

[NZWarriors.com]

your avatar

I'm so ashamed of my own behaviour I have to hang my head

 

[BroncosFever]

NRL360 would be unbearable to watch tonight after the news of players striking against the media.

That's basically their livelihood at stake.

 

[Morkel]

NRL360 would be unbearable to watch tonight after the news of players striking against the media.

That's basically their livelihood at stake.

Oh but remember the game needs the media more than the media need the game /sarcasm

 

[NZWarriors.com]

If the audio is legit, no wonder the raiders got a hiding in the 2nd half against us. Who wants to play well after getting spoken to like that.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

If the audio is legit, no wonder the raiders got a hiding in the 2nd half against us. Who wants to play well after getting spoken to like that.

HAHAHAHAA. Sounded like he was having a stroke, What a fucking idiot.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

If the audio is legit, no wonder the raiders got a hiding in the 2nd half against us. Who wants to play well after getting spoken to like that.

Legit or not, I'm pretty sure I heard this before the Warriors game

 

[Super Freak]

That is not Sticky.

There's a few things in that audio that's a dead giveaway.

"There's 22 players in this squad". That's AFL.

"3 goals we gave up that quarter". Huh? Raiders were leading 8-6 at half time. Again, 3 goals and quarter says that's AFL.

Ricky has been coaching longer than 16 years.

 

[Mustafur]

Pretty sure that's an AFL Coach having a rant from a few years back, forget the team.

The words being said sound very similar to how Lomax described Griffin when he was coach but obviously changed so he sounds like he has had a stroke from too much Coke consumption.

 

[Super Freak]

Here's the original audio.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

Annesley: "Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"

Graham Annesley explains the interpretations of charge down's and the difference between Wade Egan and DWZ's attempt to do so in the Warriors match against the South Sydney Rabbitohs

www.nrl.com

**** this guy. His clarification clarified nothing. Just says that the first "charge down" was the 9 attempting to cover the ball, when he clearly was tackling the player.

"Not every incident is the same under the laws of the game"... what? Like, just get rid of the Bungler. If we were not putting every fucking thing under the microscope we would he forced to take a shit decision as just a decision and move on. Annesley justifying all this crap post-game just ***** the game and the rules further.

I cannot stand Annesley, and l never have had any time for the prick, however I heard Tracey Badgers explanation at the time and she was correct.

My question for the useless prick, is what would have happened if that was a Melbourne player?

Just asking like.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

Get rid of his bs, get rid of the bunker overreach

I though it was a knock on in real time. I could see it come from hie hands as he tried to grab it in.

 

[NZWarriors.com]

DWZ was a knock on, Egans wasnt

 

[NZWarriors.com]

The Sharks sit third on the ladder yet have no Origin players and just 2-3 borderline Kiwi reps.

 

[BroncsFan]

The Sharks sit third on the ladder yet have no Origin players and just 2-3 borderline Kiwi reps.

And a soft as **** draw... same as last year.

They'll be bundled out again straight away

 

[NZWarriors.com]

DWZ was a knock on, Egans wasnt

Egan's wasn't ruled as a knock on