- Aug 11, 2023
- 1,662
- 2,899
If injuring the player is a determining factor, why were the tackles Anderson's and Haas's received totally ignored?
NRL 2026 Round 8 Discussion
- Thread starter Big Pete
- Start date
- Sep 28, 2012
- 15,553
- 14,197
Jersey colour
- Feb 23, 2014
- 12,072
- 17,615
Yep, and I by no means think Cobbo did what he did intentionally on Anderson, he literally tripped. But none of these hip drops are intentionally done either.
I was arguing with morons online last weekend about the Haas one. Was equally or if not more dangerous of an action than a hipdrop, badly injured a player, but because that type of tackle doesn't have a fancy name its apparently fine.
- Jul 28, 2016
- 35,414
- 51,857
Looks like Noah Martin is still playing and doesn't look like there's anything wrong with him.
So he probably milked the shit out of it, got his penalty and the binning... keeps on playing before the binning is even finished.
****wits like that will mean someone who gets a serious injury from something won't get a sin bin (and therefore won't get the 5th interchange player).
Commentators have ignored that Martin is back on and there's nothing wrong with him
So he probably milked the shit out of it, got his penalty and the binning... keeps on playing before the binning is even finished.
****wits like that will mean someone who gets a serious injury from something won't get a sin bin (and therefore won't get the 5th interchange player).
Commentators have ignored that Martin is back on and there's nothing wrong with him
- Jul 28, 2016
- 35,414
- 51,857
Is it a 'controversial try' ... or is that only broncos?
