BroncsFan
International Captain
Contributor
- Jul 28, 2016
- 22,935
- 33,982
Wish they would sack bird too and then we wouldn’t have to pay him for the rest of the year.
Why do i get the feeling we would still have to pay for him
I hadn't thought about it, but I wonder what wording is in there regarding Broncos' payments to a player that has since gone on to break clauses under the contract.
Bird has brought the game into disrepute due to his role in the party... the dragons are happy to keep him on because he's a good player and they're getting him cheap, but I wonder how the agreement is worded in regards to the broncos having to pay him.
Is there still some sort of obligation from Bird back to the Broncos where we could say... "hey he brought the game into disrepute we think his existing contract should be torn up... he had a contract with us which we were happy to honour even though he's playing at the dragons, but he has broken clauses associated with that contract and should no longer be entitled to the money associated with it"
He can keep getting paid by the dragons, but we are also a party within his contract and should be able to pull our funding, because he fucked up in regards to the terms he signed with us.