CROSS FORUM NRL Round 15 Discussion

Big Pete said:
The official didn't see it that way, he ruled tackle zero.

NRL.com also has it as an error.

Between that and Hunt not being called off-side despite impacting the Dolphins run, it was lenient officiating.
Click to expand...
It was 3m past where the play the ball was going to be anyway. If that. Not my favourite referee but that is called play on 80% of the time. He has been fine.
 
JayPee said:
It was 3m past where the play the ball was going to be anyway. If that. Not my favourite referee but that is called play on 80% of the time. He has been fine.
Click to expand...
But they wouldve been able to take it to the middle of the field, because of the error... their zero tackle advantage was being '3m' worse off, trapped in a corner and their team walking their way back onside.

And they proceeded to get bashed by a rushing sharks defensive line like it was a perfectly placed kick rather than an error.

Their first tackle still hadn't made the 10m line that they wouldve been playing the ball from.

It's more that the ref basically rewarded the error when the receiving team would absolutely take the 10m ptb... he didnt have a feel for the game in that instance
 
what was the bunker looking for there .... that took a long time to have that try confirmed
 
Foordy said:
what was the bunker looking for there .... that took a long time to have that try confirmed
Click to expand...
Would've been the Talakai run... was on the outside of Kodi and stopped in the line

Kennedy didn't run into the gap, but took Ronaldo awhile to actually get it down.
 
New Posts

Unread

Watch

YouTube
0 0 719
1:12:42
NRL Round 3, 2006 - Brisbane Broncos vs Parramatta Eels
View full media list »

Active Now

No members online now.
Total: 104 (members: 0, guests: 104)
Robots: 700
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.