Overpaid and underdelivered...

T

talanoa

NRL Player
Jan 16, 2014
1,175
740
1423043162123.jpg
Pre-season work-out: Cronulla's Ben Barba trains at Remondis Stadium. Photo: John Veage
Linking Ben Barba and "animal spirits" in the same sentence probably resurrects memories of his free-wheeling play in 2012 when he won the Dally M medal as the NRL's best player, or perhaps evoke stories of his descent into anti-social behaviour the following year.
"Animal spirits", was, however, a term used by the great English economist, John Maynard Keynes, to describe irrational, emotion-driven monetary behaviour.
Barba's payments by the Bulldogs, Broncos and Sharks over four years demonstrate how clubs can make bizarre decisions, even within the constraints of a salary cap. The salary ceiling works at a macro level, distributing talent around the NRL, provided it is forensically policed, but at a micro level it is subject to what Keynes called "spontaneous optimism rather than mathematical expectation".
1423047297381.jpg
New surrounds: Ben Barba with Sharks coach Shane Flanagan. Photo: John Veage
Barba will be paid $550,000 at the Sharks this year, more than twice the $250,000 he was paid at the Bulldogs in 2012 when he was twice the player he is now. OK, the salary cap is now $6.55m, an increase of nearly 50 per cent since 2012 when it was $4.4m.
But Barba's payment has more than doubled after two seasons when he went backward at the Bulldogs (2013) and failed to impress at the Broncos (2014).
There has been considerable speculation in coaching circles about what Barba received at the Broncos, with some believing he was paid $950,000 last year and was set to receive $1m this year and $1.05m in 2016.
However, it is mind-bending to believe Barba's salary jumped from $250,000 to nearly a million dollars, especially when it is understood Bulldogs chief executive Raelene Castle had a handshake deal with her Broncos counterpart, Paul White, that Barba would not be rewarded by breaking a contract.
It's more likely the Broncos paid Barba slightly below half the rumoured money and less than what he will be paid at the Sharks, which is $550,000 this season, $600,000 in 2016 and $650,000 in 2017.
After all, the Sharks have room in their budget after the departure of Todd Carney.
But a payout the Broncos made Barba for him to walk away from the final two years of his contract lends weight to the theory he was on a motza in Brisbane. The enigmatic fullback/five eighth was paid $500,000 to agree to a release in order for incoming coach, Wayne Bennett, to sign Darius Boyd, the player who has followed him to St George Illawarra, Newcastle and now back to Brisbane. It has ended up being a great deal for Barba, even if the lower estimation of $450,000 to $550,000 per season at the Broncos is correct.
Firstly, he will be paid more at the Sharks. Secondly, he has an additional year of big money (2017) and thirdly, he receives a $500,000 payout.
He was also able to escape the salary strait jacket of players with long-term contracts spread over the two broadcasting deals when the NRL's TV income more than doubled.
The salary cap jumped from $4.4m in Barba's first season at the Bulldogs to $5.85m in his second season, yet his contract was set to stay at $250,000.
Unless NRL players had a clause written into their contracts guaranteeing an adjustment in accordance with broadcasting fees, they are stuck on the same money.
Had Barba stayed at the Bulldogs, he would have received $1m over four years. Now, when he is half the player he was in that first season, he will be paid approximately $2.7m, the sum of his year at the Broncos, his termination payment and his three years at the Sharks.
This certainly is "spontaneous optimism" under Keynes's definition of "animal spirits".
So, too, is the $500,000 bonanza to Barba for Bennett's loyalty to Boyd. It is a big hit on the Broncos salary cap, although it can be spread over two seasons, included in their 2015 and 2016 payments.
 
can anyone tell me where I get paid double to perform below standard?
 
BHQ Admin. Wait, what?
 
...but what if he delivers the Sharks their first ever premiership, he will be undervalued then

Am i rite?
 
Surely those figures that the Broncos were paying him can't be right!?
 
Not overly surprised about the article, tbh. Players like Barba, Dave Taylor etc, guys who show enormous potential, will always find a club. I think the reason is because other clubs and their coaches think they can turn them around.

The idea of them playing well is often a stronger temptation than the reality of what they actually deliver.
 
Not overly surprised about the article, tbh. Players like Barba, Dave Taylor etc, guys who show enormous potential, will always find a club. I think the reason is because other clubs and their coaches think they can turn them around.

The idea of them playing well is often a stronger temptation than the reality of what they actually deliver.
Surely you're not comparing Dave Taylor with Ben Barba, are you? :shocked:

Barba has delivered plenty on his potential, albeit not at the Broncos, while Taylor is still in the promise stage.

This article would confirm that Boyd came to the Broncos for roughly the same amount as Barba, and the latter was not being paid the ridiculous $850K+ amounts that did the rounds at one point...
 
He won't. If anything, they'll finish 9th.

I think the Sharks are going to surprise a few this year. Done some good recruitment, Flano back etc etc. They are a good smoky for the top 8 this year.
 
Dave is still in the promise stage, that's one hell of a long promise delivering time frame.
 
Last edited:
I think the Sharks are going to surprise a few this year. Done some good recruitment, Flano back etc etc. They are a good smoky for the top 8 this year.

Surprise a few this year perhaps, win a premiership?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Active Now

  • sooticus
  • Dash
  • Fitzy
  • GCBRONCO
  • Brocko
  • Xzei
  • ettybay
  • lynx000
  • beaseagull
  • Lostboy
  • I bleed Maroon
  • Sproj
  • Locky’s Left Boot
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.