1
1910
International Rep
- Apr 14, 2013
- 15,875
- 20,081
- Thread starter
- #181
None of anything you said has any relevance in the discussion we're having unfortunately. I agree with literally everything you said, we should be rewarding runs over all else. I'm talking exclusively about this specific scenario, Hemphrey isn't Hussey, or Voges, or Klinger.. He's a guy who's nearly 30 years old and has only managed to play 25 shield games and averages 32. What are we gaining by rewarding & nurturing that type of player ahead of a 23 year old putting up comparatively similar numbers, who may have a chance at the type of late bloomer run you're referencing.
No we are at polar opposites- you said Shield should be a development competition for young batsmen.
That's the opposite of what I believe. I think you should be in the best 11 cricketers in your state and older players have a tremendous role.