Old Mate
NRL Player
- Jul 5, 2008
- 2,885
- 2,531
Did Patten say some shit about reffing dodgey years ago or was there some controversy or something with him?
If the bunker has to replay it that many fricken times then there is no way they can say they are certain and overturn the on field decision..... Which was try.
The fact that people can't agree if the elbow hits the ground says that there is insufficient evidence to over rule. Try.
Did Patten say some shit about reffing dodgey years ago or was there some controversy or something with him?
Or just keep passing it to Sims.If half our team play like Sims we are a chance.
If half our team play like Sims we are a chance.
And not be a cross-eyed fuckwitgiven he played for the Bulldogs ... the fucker shouldn't be allowed to ref their games ... you need to at least have the "appearance" of impartiality
That’s where benefit of the doubt use to come into it years ago.
Or just keep passing it to Sims.
As soon as they start replaying it over and over again it usually means they're overturning.If the bunker has to replay it that many fricken times then there is no way they can say they are certain and overturn the on field decision..... Which was try.
Never thought the word "Sims" would ever feature in a sentence like this. He's going well.Or just keep passing it to Sims.
As soon as they start replaying it over and over again it usually means they're overturning.
Yeah and benefit of the doubt is now meant to go to the refs decision... clear wrong call from the vid refThat’s where benefit of the doubt use to come into it years ago.