- Sep 8, 2009
- 8,458
- 10,825
You’re thinking of moron.Just so you know......
Gordon is spelt with 2 o's.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’re thinking of moron.Just so you know......
Gordon is spelt with 2 o's.![]()
Riki just got called one of the "Top 3" second rowers in the comp on 360......
****. Me. lmao
It was Staggs not Riki. Ritchie was saying he's the best centre in the comp atm - if not at least top 3.Riki just got called one of the "Top 3" second rowers in the comp on 360......
****. Me. lmao
It was Staggs not Riki. Ritchie was saying he's the best centre in the comp atm - if not at least top 3.
What annoys me the most about all of this is how they are all just pretending this is a reaction to his recent jab at Reynolds alone. You can hold the view that even with the sustained attacks from CONEHEAD for over a decade this is still a petty action, that’s fine, but it’s disingenuous to pretend it is just about this comment. Furthermore if they feel the need to try and paint it that way it suggests they think reasonable people would think The Broncos reaction was justified if they had the full context.Yeah he got glazed hard, which was predictable. As if he hasn't been on our ass like a Tick for the better part of 10 years.
Said the guy whose name is actually spelled xxxxI must apologise...seems you're right.
View attachment 38357
****head can't even spell his own name right.
That’s just how these News scum work though, isn’t it? They’ll try and control the narrative and will happily lie to do it.What annoys me the most about all of this is how they are all just pretending this is a reaction to his recent jab at Reynolds alone. You can hold the view that even with the sustained attacks from CONEHEAD for over a decade this is still a petty action, that’s fine, but it’s disingenuous to pretend it is just about this comment. Furthermore if they feel the need to try and paint it that way it suggests they think reasonable people would think The Broncos reaction was justified if they had the full context.
My mistake. Riki was on screen in the background at the time, I came in to the moment late.
may i ask why you bothered to come into any NRL 360 moment at all?
All the same idiots are all on the same podcast or show, first idiot makes something up on one podcast, and then the next idiot repeats it on the next podcast, and then it’s reported as gospel on the third podcast by the first idiot who originally made it up. It’s one source for like a dozen different shows because it’s all the same people.That’s just how these News scum work though, isn’t it? They’ll try and control the narrative and will happily lie to do it.
How many times have we seen it? One of them says they have mail that things are crook in Brisbane for example. Is it true? Almost certainly not.
The next day, their papers are saying reports are that Brisbane is in turmoil. Suddenly, they’re all reporting it as fact.
A pox on all their houses. They wouldn’t know the meaning of journalistic integrity if it bit them on the arse.
I wanted to see CONEHEAD comments after the week that was. Turned it off after that.
It was Staggs not Riki. Ritchie was saying he's the best centre in the comp atm - if not at least top 3.