Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Videos
Random
Playlists
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
The Rumour Mill
[Rumour] The Hunt for Karmichael's return to Broncos.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="subsbligh, post: 2610539, member: 1950"] There's three separate issues there Morks: 1. Player third party deals - greyness of identification/classification - are they only getting this contract because of their contract with the club, or did they independently source the income themselves? 2. Player third party deals - player income - disclosure rules state all income must be disclosed to salary cap auditor. 3. Salary cap - back ending deals. In relation to 1 and 2, it's an absolute minefield. Under the current rules, a player is supposed to report any income including, for example, money they earn on investment properties or unrelated businesses (e.g. Lockyer and his coffee shops). I highly doubt there is 100% or even close to 50% compliance in this aspect. This is where the clubs and players work the grey to their advantage and things come unstuck. As an aside, this is why people who critise salary cap breaches as moral corruption of the highest order need be mindful (glass houses and all that). Inglis has a deal with ASICS. Who determines if that is a reportable third party deal, and if so, to what extent? He'd have that deal whether he plays for Souths, Melbourne or in fact in another code or country because he is Greg Inglis. So does the salary cap auditor have the discretion to determine what is and isn't a reportable deal? How frequently does the auditor role change? Who's keeping an eye on the auditor? Are the decisions published to all clubs and players/agents? If not, why not? Is there a better code of conduct that the general public aren't aware of? In relation to back ending deals - so what the Gasnier didn't get what he was apparently worth? He probably would have played for $1, but only for St George. There has to be a careful look at the intention of those rules - undervalued salaries [I]might, [/I]but not always, indicate some degree of unlawfulness (that the club and player are hiding unlawful third party payments), and how can an auditor possibly value the subjective value of Gasnier's loyalty to St George? It's a crock of shit, an overcomplicated system dodged by shivs (player agents), administered poorly (auditors) and only ever hurts the players and the fans when punished. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
Footy Fanatic
Justwin
Sproj
Thelmus
1910
Big Del
broncsgoat
Jedhead
theshed
Dash
Skyblues87
TonyTheJugoslav
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
The Rumour Mill
[Rumour] The Hunt for Karmichael's return to Broncos.
Top
AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.