Should Luke Walsh have been charged with bringing the game into disrepute

Kaz

Kaz

State of Origin Captain
Mar 5, 2008
10,017
3,759
for saying Glenn Hall spat on him.
THE NRL match review committee is adamant North Queensland forward Glenn Hall did not spit on Panthers halfback Luke Walsh during Saturday night's clash in Townsville.
After viewing a confrontation between the two players, the panel decided against charging Hall, who was accused of spitting on Walsh.

"We contacted the Penrith club and were told Luke Walsh had declined to make a statement about the incident," said match review committee boss Greg McCallum.

"We also viewed some additional camera angles where Hall was clearly in the frame. On the evidence we saw, no spit took place.

"Some words were said by Hall and they were aggressive. It was a spray but not a saliva spray.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/n...it-at-luke-walsh/story-e6frfgbo-1226106262679

IMO Walsh should have been charged.
 
Yes I am for real Mr Cranky.

You know if you have been spat on.
 
He should be BANNED for LIFE. This is the BIGGEST SCANDAL IN THE HISTORY OF THE GAME, and the NRL should not stand for it. Gallop: Grow a pair and send Walsh off to the dole office.
I can't believe more people aren't upset about this!
 
I am spitting chips!

But not at the direction of any person.
 
I'm with Dukey on this one, absolute disgrace.
 
Did he rape the guys mother too?

If not, then no.
 

Active Now

  • bb_gun
  • Broncosgirl
  • Mustafur
  • marw
  • leish107
  • Fitzy
  • mitch222
  • thenry
  • teampjta
  • Tmac
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.