Broncapz
NRL Player
- May 1, 2016
- 2,962
- 6,972
This thread should be : Do you want the Mam to be able to pay the victims or not?
Mam would have likely been advised to to reach out personally.
This was always headed towards legal action both civilly and criminally. under those circumstances, even a first year law student would advise him not to contact the other parties
Isn't it usually the risk of admitting guilt?
He didn't know what he was going to be charged with... it seems like his statement came out almost straight after the charges were released suggesting he will probably plead guilty and the lawyers will be sorting out a deal.
I'm not going to pretend i know about that sort of thing legally. I'm just talking from my perspective. If i knew i was guilty of something like he did, i'd just cop it on the chin. He knew he had no license. He knew he had taken drugs, and he knew he wasnt driving in a safe manner. I'd just want to make thing right as best i could.
TBF, I doubt any of us know what we'd do in that situation.
but i suspect most people would be listening to the advice of their lawyers (especially if you've got the sort of money a top sports player makes)
Have you seen their writing?Which i actually said. You must not be a very good doctor if you cant even read.
He doesn't even have a license. Disqualified from driving, that will teach him. They're gonna get him real good they are.
Ezra will have absolutely no involvement either financially or legally in any civil case arising from this accident. Any person injured as a result of this motor vehicle accident or any other motor vehicle accident in Queensland is entitled to lodge a claim with the CTP insurer of the at fault vehicle which we assume is the vehicle driven by Ezra. The insurer of that vehicle assumes the role of defendant in legal proceedings. Once liability is admitted by that insurer, which is likely in this case, the insurer's role then is to firstly fund the rehabilitation costs of injured claimants and once this has occurred the quantum of damages (compensation amounts) are negotiated between the injured parties' solicitors and the insurer. Significantly less than 1% of these claims go to court but even if any claims from this accident did proceed to court, Ezra's involvement in any future proceedings is already complete. He will not be liable for one cent of the compensation if there is any. In very rare circumstances an insurer may seek to recover some of the damages awarded in cases where criminal behaviour contributed to the accident. Based on the very minor charges laid, the chances of that happening are also practically zero. Ezra has NOT been charged with DUI or dangerous driving. From my observation of things, and the resultant police action, this was a low speed accident, caused by Ezra failing to pay due care and attention. The incidental finding of a drug in his system seems to have been deemed insignificant enough that it has had no bearing whatsoever on Ezra's ability to control the vehicle. Otherwise he would have been charged with a more serious offence relating to DUI. When media speculation gets in the way of facts, people start calling for 12 month bans and sackings which is beyond ridiculous. Hopefully the NRL can see past the distortion. I suspect the Broncos have already done this which is good to see.
Have you seen their writing?
The injured parties will be compensated fairly under our state's excellent CTP scheme. The fact he was unlicensed has no bearing on that. As an example, let's say I was driving my kids to school and I momentarily turned around to grab a lunch box or something from the backseat and I lost control and crashed into a pole. Who do my kids sue if they are badly injured? Thankfully, it's not me. It is the CTP insurer that I nominated when when the vehicle was registered at renewal. That is the system. Likewise if someone was to crash into the back of your stationary vehicle and you sustain an injury, because you weren't at fault, you are entitled to claim compensation from that vehicle's CTP insurer. If individuals were liable you would need to hope that the at fault driver had the financial means to compensate you which not many people would. That is why this system was put in place. Ezra will face the consequences of the law but not any financial liability for the injured parties. They will be looked after.Are you sure he's not civilly liable?
He was driving unlicenced, and has affected the lives of the other occupants.
Ezra will have absolutely no involvement either financially or legally in any civil case arising from this accident. Any person injured as a result of this motor vehicle accident or any other motor vehicle accident in Queensland is entitled to lodge a claim with the CTP insurer of the at fault vehicle which we assume is the vehicle driven by Ezra. The insurer of that vehicle assumes the role of defendant in legal proceedings. Once liability is admitted by that insurer, which is likely in this case, the insurer's role then is to firstly fund the rehabilitation costs of injured claimants and once this has occurred the quantum of damages (compensation amounts) are negotiated between the injured parties' solicitors and the insurer. Significantly less than 1% of these claims go to court but even if any claims from this accident did proceed to court, Ezra's involvement in any future proceedings is already complete. He will not be liable for one cent of the compensation if there is any. In very rare circumstances an insurer may seek to recover some of the damages awarded in cases where criminal behaviour contributed to the accident. Based on the very minor charges laid, the chances of that happening are also practically zero. Ezra has NOT been charged with DUI or dangerous driving. From my observation of things, and the resultant police action, this was a low speed accident, caused by Ezra failing to pay due care and attention. The incidental finding of a drug in his system seems to have been deemed insignificant enough that it has had no bearing whatsoever on Ezra's ability to control the vehicle. Otherwise he would have been charged with a more serious offence relating to DUI. When media speculation gets in the way of facts, people start calling for 12 month bans and sackings which is beyond ridiculous. Hopefully the NRL can see past the distortion. I suspect the Broncos have already done this which is good to see.