Those moments that make you shake

[Big Pete]

This was disgraceful.

How embarrassing.

Guess who.

 

[Big Pete]

The original sin.

Klein decided that after a 100 years it was time for a new interpretation of a knock on.

 

[Jazza]

Nothing ever really got said about it but Ben hunt lost the ball backwards in that 2015 gp gf.

I haven’t rewatched for obvious reasons, but I remember at the time thinking Feldt knocked on stripping the ball from Milford shortly before stripping it off Hunt. Would have given us a chance to close out the game

 

[Foordy]

Ben Cummins again in the 2019 GF Raiders vs Roosters. this is the six again controversy. Raiders put up a kick and get the ball back, Cummins calls six again. the Raiders get tackled with the ball and Cummins rules hand over.

at some point after he called six again but before the tackle was completed, he changed his mind and said it was the last tackle

 

[tommy]

Ben Cummins again in the 2019 GF Raiders vs Roosters. this is the six again controversy. Raiders put up a kick and get the ball back, Cummins calls six again. the Raiders get tackled with the ball and Cummins rules hand over.

at some point after he called six again but before the tackle was completed, he changed his mind and said it was the last tackle

Same game roosters got some major advantage for the kick going into their trainer iirc. Some bs happened can’t recall what exactly. Or maybe a dif game?

 

[BroncsFan]

Same game roosters got some major advantage for the kick going into their trainer iirc. Some bs happened can’t recall what exactly. Or maybe a dif game?

Nah it was that game.

They kicked it after a shit set?? and it made contact with the trainer (I think it was charged down or something because trainer was like 10m behind the play and raiders were going to recover it)... was called a mutual infringement, but I think the rule back then was the same as the 1908 version for unlimited tackles and they got a new full set of six?

 

[tommy]

Sam Thaiday getting a weeks suspension for touching the ref after Melbourne held him in the scrum preventing him from defending demonstrating to the ref what happened springs to mind.

 

[tommy]

Nah it was that game.

They kicked it after a shit set?? and it made contact with the trainer (I think it was charged down or something because trainer was like 10m behind the play and raiders were going to recover it)... was called a mutual infringement, but I think the rule back then was the same as the 1908 version for unlimited tackles and they got a new full set of six?

I think it depended what attacking half it happened in. Roosters got the scrum because the contact with the trainer was made in their attacking half. Some stupid old rule like that.