vertigo
State of Origin Rep
- Mar 2, 2010
- 6,329
- 4,450
It took your mind off the ridiculous "rumour" in the first post.
H
Hatchy
NRL Player
- Mar 25, 2008
- 1,004
- 4
Anti climax ending to it. I wanted it to do explode aswell.
Professor47
NRL Player
- Mar 5, 2008
- 1,632
- 81
Really reckon Wallace will resign on a downgrade though?
Also - not a huge fan of the "too small" debate (ala Langer) but Sandow is definitely too small. I don't think its a huge problem apart from on-line goal D - esp repeat sets. I just think its a bother to formulate a D based on getting a bodyguard usually a backrower/lock to help out the small player. E.g Scott/Soward. Firstly - because you can really only afford ONE Soward size player in your team IMO which means if there are any injuries etc etc you've already filled your 'small player' spot so if you get another 'smallish' player it sends your D into disarray IMO. Secondly it is extra structure you need to work on and its open to exploit by other teams. Lastly - no matter what sometime in the game when the team manages to get that 1v1 somehow close to the line you're in trouble. I just think when a big game is on the line you leave yourself open to that.
Also - not a huge fan of the "too small" debate (ala Langer) but Sandow is definitely too small. I don't think its a huge problem apart from on-line goal D - esp repeat sets. I just think its a bother to formulate a D based on getting a bodyguard usually a backrower/lock to help out the small player. E.g Scott/Soward. Firstly - because you can really only afford ONE Soward size player in your team IMO which means if there are any injuries etc etc you've already filled your 'small player' spot so if you get another 'smallish' player it sends your D into disarray IMO. Secondly it is extra structure you need to work on and its open to exploit by other teams. Lastly - no matter what sometime in the game when the team manages to get that 1v1 somehow close to the line you're in trouble. I just think when a big game is on the line you leave yourself open to that.
Renegade
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Mar 14, 2008
- 9,260
- 11,915
I think I'd rather Wallace over Sandow.
At least you know what you're gonna get with Wallace, Sandow is worse than a lucky dip and it's more often than not, a shit pick.
At least you know what you're gonna get with Wallace, Sandow is worse than a lucky dip and it's more often than not, a shit pick.
