Locky was definitely okay, but Reece has leapfrogged him. A lot of folk are still in denial about it, but they'll come around.
I think Reece has a higher ceiling, but don't let recency bias impact the fact that Locky should be the next Immortal. He's not a great board member, investor, and many other things - but in footy, there were few better.
If Reece can produce what he did in this Final Series, not all the time, but in clutch games like he did this year, he'll be one of the greats for sure.
Unfortunately, flash in the pan brilliance can be quickly forgotten, hence why Immortals are often named many years after they retire.
In my mind, he's already better than Billy Slater with the only caveat being longevity. If he can keep his form up for a few seasons, he'll have conquered him and Billy was the best fullback I've ever seen in 30+ years of watching League.
Locky, was a great fullback, a great five-eighth. An excellent leader of men and had the ability to pull rabbits out of hats just when we needed him to. His game vision was unparalleled in his time and has probably only been equaled by C Smith and Johns.
Reece has far more raw talent than both Smith and Locky combined, but his ability to deliver in clutch moments, until very recently has been missing. The try he scored in the grand final, where he threw the 5th tackle play out of the window because he saw something, re-positioned and demanded the ball. THAT was Darren Lockyer. What Darren Lockyer maybe lacked though, was the bullshit freak ability to cut through the middle of their team and score.