I think all these doom and gloomers about the club this year need to decide if they would prefer to be near the top each year and win nothing or would they prefer to win a premiership? Like we just won the premiership FFS.
What this doom and gloomer would like is to be THE best, not just win a comp once every 20 years.
Why should it be a choice between those two things? Why can't we be the next Penrith? Why aren't we the current Penrith?
We are the biggest NRL club in the world, why don't we act like it? Why have we spent the last 20 years in Melbourne's shadow and can only dream of the success Penrith have had in the last 6 years?
How have we lost ALL of Haas, Fifita, Dearden, Flegler, Farnworth, Walsh (yes he returned but he still left), Hetherington, Bullemor, Collins, Gray, Cobbo and so on and not have ready made replacements?
Even in your scenario, how on earth should anyone be happy with 1 win and 3 grand finals in 20 years when you are the biggest club in the world? We've also won a wooden spoon in that time and probably missed finals more than we've made as well.
As
@Cult said, it shouldn't have to be a choice. The Roosters have ONE bad season and bounce almost straight back and win two in a row and are there or thereabouts year in, year out and until recently, didn't even have a development system.
How can we be the richest club WITH a development system and still struggle to maintain a high level of prominence / success?
I'll put it back on you, do you non-doom and gloomers feel satisfied with our 'success' of the last 20 years? This is something the West Tigers should be over the moon with, not us.
We should be winning a premiership every 3-5 years and making prelims regularly in between. Not a GF here and there and absolutely nothing in between.
We should not settle, we should seek sustained greatness - we should aim to be Penrith, not Wests.