2024 NRL Player Movements & Rumours

[Financeguy]

Your 300 K is more like 120 K after tax and management fees .
Then that 120 K will get chewed up in real estate agent fees just selling and buying another house .
If you were happy staying in Melbourne and you and your family were not keen on Sydney its a pretty simple decision . So yeah nothing suss .

Stamp duty alone would wipe out more than a years worth of contract variance assuming he wants to live in a semi decent house

 

[Financeguy]

The difference is that the position was wide open when Munster was selected. JT had just played his final ever rep. game and after Milford failed his audition, Morgan had slotted into the centres so Munster had a free passage to come into the 6.

Meanwhile Tedesco was on his way to becoming the NSW Captain and Trbojevic was about to produce one of the all-time great seasons of any fullback in history.

From memory Paps always had a question on his physicality when discussing Origin selection in the Sydney media all those years ago as well...certainly behind in the pecking order from those you mentioned.

 

[Foordy]

It's understood the Bulldogs were willing to pay over $1 million per season for Papenhuyzen - up to $300,000 more per year than Melbourne - but that the fullback ultimately decided to remain in Melbourne.

Leading contenders emerge to sign Ben Hunt for 2025

He has caught the attention of four teams from NSW and QLD.

www.zerotackle.com

Nothing suss here when it comes to the Storm as always your honour.

I'm certainly not one to defend the Storm ... But when you're at that salary level and happy where you're living and working, then $300k a year might not be enough to cause you to uproot your life.

For example, Reece Walsh could have easily got another $300k a year to play at another club ... But he was happy where he was, signed with us for significantly less than he could have got elsewhere

 

[Sproj]

Look I don't care, I just want us to be held to the same standard. So when we re-sign Staggs, Cobbo, Mozer and whoever on massive unders, we can play the same card.

 

[Brocko]

Dogs should throw a deal at Sua... he should be allowed to negotiate given Paps has signed an exextension

I don't believe he actually can trigger that clause due to Pap only signing a 1 yr extension

 

[mitch222]

I'm certainly not one to defend the Storm ... But when you're at that salary level and happy where you're living and working, then $300k a year might not be enough to cause you to uproot your life.

For example, Reece Walsh could have easily got another $300k a year to play at another club ... But he was happy where he was, signed with us for significantly less than he could have got elsewhere

Reece Walsh is from Brisbane and has family ties keeping him in Brisbane.
Papenhauzen is from Sydney. The shares is Betr must have just got increased a little bit more to entice him to re sign.

 

[Big Del]

Look I don't care, I just want us to be held to the same standard. So when we re-sign Staggs, Cobbo, Mozer and whoever on massive unders, we can play the same card.

Some cheese to go with that ?

 

[Sproj]

Reece Walsh is from Brisbane and has family ties keeping him in Brisbane.
Papenhauzen is from Sydney. The shares is Betr must have just got increased a little bit more to entice him to re sign.

He also has an extensive injury history, to the point he almost had to retire. Saying no to multiple years at 1 million + to re-sign for 700k for one year, this is the bit that is massively suss.

 

[BroncsFan]

He also has an extensive injury history, to the point he almost had to retire. Saying no to multiple years at 1 million + to re-sign for 700k for one year, this is the bit that is massively suss.

Yeah that's the part that is suss to me.

Giving up guaranteed money from more years.

What he's done goes against all logical thinking in regards to player negotiations and contracts.

Going for a short contracts on unders is what someone trying to make a comeback would do... see Schuster, JAC, etc. They just want to play and will back themselves to get a higher contract after 12 months.

Paps doesnt need to back himself because the money was already on the table from dogs.

So if you're going to sign for unders than it would mean the contract is longer for more security... nope decided to sign a 12 month extension rather than multi year deal on higher money.

So for some reason he's decided to give up more money and security, despite being near retired from injury a few years back and also the team he has extended with has his long term replacement sitting at the club.

My theory on it is that Paps is the starter this year, but at some point Sua may jump him as the starter for 2026... then next year Paps will just break his deal and move anyway... but in the meantime he's a safety net for storm and at worst Paps has a $700k contract sitting there.

If Paps has a blinder of a year storm may recommit to him and just let Sua walk.

Basically storm are able to have their cake and eat it to, with minimal risk to their cap position.

It's an extremely club friendly deal for a player to sign up to.

What if Paps has a shit year, Sua gets lined up to replace him and he never sees the chance of a $1m deal again.

 

[Broncosgirl]

Yeah that's the part that is suss to me.

Giving up guaranteed money from more years.

What he's done goes against all logical thinking in regards to player negotiations and contracts.

Going for a short contracts on unders is what someone trying to make a comeback would do... see Schuster, JAC, etc. They just want to play and will back themselves to get a higher contract after 12 months.

Paps doesnt need to back himself because the money was already on the table from dogs.

So if you're going to sign for unders than it would mean the contract is longer for more security... nope decided to sign a 12 month extension rather than multi year deal on higher money.

So for some reason he's decided to give up more money and security, despite being near retired from injury a few years back and also the team he has extended with has his long term replacement sitting at the club.

My theory on it is that Paps is the starter this year, but at some point Sua may jump him as the starter for 2026... then next year Paps will just break his deal and move anyway... but in the meantime he's a safety net for storm and at worst Paps has a $700k contract sitting there.

If Paps has a blinder of a year storm may recommit to him and just let Sua walk.

Basically storm are able to have their cake and eat it to, with minimal risk to their cap position.

It's an extremely club friendly deal for a player to sign up to.

What if Paps has a shit year, Sua gets lined up to replace him and he never sees the chance of a $1m deal again.

"So for some reason he's decided to give up more money and security, despite being near retired from injury a few years back and also the team he has extended with has his long term replacement sitting at the club."

He is only 1 game away from medical retirement. Maybe he has an eye on what that kind of future might look like, and if wanting to remain in Melbourne post his NRL career .. is trying to set himself up for employment with the Storm going forward?

Giving up 300k now for longer term financial security would make sense?

 

[Sproj]

Its 300k for one year. The Dogs were offering multiple years, so let's say for arguments' sake - 3 years. He's given up 900k to a million.

 

[Broncosgirl]

Its 300k for one year. The Dogs were offering multiple years, so let's say for arguments' sake - 3 years. He's given up 900k to a million.

If he had to be med retired, does his contract value need to be paid out?

 

[FACTHUNT]

And we can’t forget that munster ditched $2m in total (for life of the contract) to stay in Melbourne. And he’s a father of like 15.

Oh yeah, and then young Utoikinmanu ditching how many hundreds of thousands more that he could have earned at the Tigers or Bulldogs.

The Phins will throw everything at Hughes, but he’ll stay - screw ~000,000 - I’m in Melbourne for the vibes and my shitty podcast!!

 

[Foordy]

And we can’t forget that munster ditched $2m in total (for life of the contract) to stay in Melbourne. And he’s a father of like 15.

Oh yeah, and then young Utoikinmanu ditching how many hundreds of thousands more that he could have earned at the Tigers or Bulldogs.

The Phins will throw everything at Hughes, but he’ll stay - screw ~000,000 - I’m in Melbourne for the vibes and my shitty podcast!!

Let's not forget Reece Walsh sacrificing $1.5 million + to sign long term with us.

I don't blame uto ... He's been on big money at the tigers for years and has never played a finals game ... Some players will sacrifice cash for a genuine shot at a premiership

 

[FACTHUNT]

Let's not forget Reece Walsh sacrificing $1.5 million + to sign long term with us.

I don't blame uto ... He's been on big money at the tigers for years and has never played a finals game ... Some players will sacrifice cash for a genuine shot at a premiership

I get that arguement with Uto - the ther two are the most suss given that they’ve won already.

Walshy is all hypothetical because he never went to market - so it’s not an identical comparison.

Let’s see what happens with Cobbo and Staggs once we hear their other offers, and if they elect to stay.

 

[BroncsFan]

"So for some reason he's decided to give up more money and security, despite being near retired from injury a few years back and also the team he has extended with has his long term replacement sitting at the club."

He is only 1 game away from medical retirement. Maybe he has an eye on what that kind of future might look like, and if wanting to remain in Melbourne post his NRL career .. is trying to set himself up for employment with the Storm going forward?

Giving up 300k now for longer term financial security would make sense?

If he medically retires then he gets his contract fully paid out to him and no repercussions on the club... other than the outlay... refer the huge payout Sam Burgess got from the bunnies when medically retiring with like 4yr left on his deal.

So if he's thinking he's 1 game from retirement then he is way way out of pocket, because dogs would have to pay him full freight for a multi year $1m contract... instead of the 12month deal he just signed up to.

The life after football is the part that is missing here... a potential golden handshake from the storm.

The writing appears to be on the wall with Sua there... has he been given some sort of guarantee off the books that if he takes this club friendly deal he will be rewarded post footy... noting he would likely be inline for a post footy career regardless... I think in 2022 he was identified as the most marketable player in the game and that's mainly dropped due to Reece and the injuries.

 

[BroncsFan]

Its 300k for one year. The Dogs were offering multiple years, so let's say for arguments' sake - 3 years. He's given up 900k to a million.

He's given up more than that if we're talking guaranteed money.

$700k for one year vs $3m over life of the dogs contract.

He's giving up $2.3m as it stands

 

[Sproj]

So basically, no one can complain if we keep our players or under of Penrith, etc. There is something very clearly going on that’s dodgy here but because Tripp is a massive figure in gambling, the NRL will just turn a blind eye.