I didn't see any real change in the way we played the game. To me it doesn't matter about who was in the team or contracts or anything else, we had 17 players each week and there were no plays, no new techniques, no clearly rehearsed set ups, no direction and no controlled movements. I expected to see some coherence even if it was just one play that had been carefully rehearsed and attempted time and again.
I thought I'd see at least one Bellamy type play, at least one. It absolutely does not matter who plays a role in the play but that a play is in motion. It seemed directionless, either off the cuff or an individual like Haas or Fifita doing something.
For me this is on Seibold. If it was me or one of you guys on this forum I'm sure you would have had a play or two that you'd drill into the team, our signature move if you like. All I really saw after 5, 10, 20,25 rounds were a bunch of guys who didn't know what was coming next. This has to be Seibolds fault, his coaching.
Hey, I could be wrong too, I just might not have been observant enough but for most of the year it looked lik they'd hardly ever played together. I'd love to see the Walker brothers come in as our 'Plays ,Specialist Team Advisors'.