VOTE BHQ Player of Round 2

[Lostboy]

Voting is closed and with a total of 28 votes (90.3%), BHQ's Man of the Match for Round 2 is Selwyn Cobbo.

View attachment 32026

Jesse Arthars coming second with 24 votes (77.4%), and Deine Mariner coming third with 17 votes (54.8%).

Leaderboard graphic coming soon.

I have been thinking about changing the scoring this year to what the NRL does. Instead of the tally being total votes, go with the 3-2-1 system instead. Felt like that provided a more accurate leaderboard when I did it for the fun of it at the end of last year.

Yep absolutely.
Let's put it to a vote..

 

[MrTickyMcG]

I agree, I like 3-2-1 and then I like to say blast off and then go ppppfffffsssshhhhhwwwwwaaaaaahhh with my mouth and start my hand down low and then make it go as high as I can....

I am 5 years old.

 

[davidp]

definitely 3,2,1 - better reward to best player

 

[I bleed Maroon]

I've been doing 3 2 1 for years, I dunno what you other bozos are thinking lol

 

[Mustafur]

Voting is closed and with a total of 28 votes (90.3%), BHQ's Man of the Match for Round 2 is Selwyn Cobbo.

View attachment 32026

Jesse Arthars coming second with 24 votes (77.4%), and Deine Mariner coming third with 17 votes (54.8%).

Leaderboard graphic coming soon.

I have been thinking about changing the scoring this year to what the NRL does. Instead of the tally being total votes, go with the 3-2-1 system instead. Felt like that provided a more accurate leaderboard when I did it for the fun of it at the end of last year.

Yeah definitely, it will give a more accurate picture at the end even if numbers will definitely inflate.

 

[McHunt]

Voting is closed and with a total of 28 votes (90.3%), BHQ's Man of the Match for Round 2 is Selwyn Cobbo.

View attachment 32026

Jesse Arthars coming second with 24 votes (77.4%), and Deine Mariner coming third with 17 votes (54.8%).

Leaderboard graphic coming soon.

I have been thinking about changing the scoring this year to what the NRL does. Instead of the tally being total votes, go with the 3-2-1 system instead. Felt like that provided a more accurate leaderboard when I did it for the fun of it at the end of last year.

I ran this experiment in various permutations at the insistence of @theshed a few years ago.

It made no significant difference. None. It was just more work.

The hurdle is at the collection layer, not the weekly tally.

If you want to go with a Dally M style, voters would need to rank the players or allocate points. You could say, ask to spread 10 points across the team. Or simply rank them in order. Any number of players.

Unfortunately, last time I looked the polling options don't include numerical input or ranking.

The current system probably gives the right outcome.