CRICKET Big Bash Discussion

96 after 10 with McSweeney great start, Renshaw, Bryant and Alsoo to come. It’s not gonna be a win but it’s not a bad crack.
 
They needed to give Bryant the full innings. At least he will come in now but he will have to go old style, he has no time to get set. Stupid structure for this innings from the get go.
 
They needed to give Bryant the full innings. At least he will come in now but he will have to go old style, he has no time to get set. Stupid structure for this innings from the get go.
We had a 0.01% chance of chasing it may as well take the loss and bat in a way where we can mitigate the nrr impacts than get all out for 30 going for it and being done for the rest of the season cause our nrr is to bad to compete
 
We had a 0.01% chance of chasing it may as well take the loss and bat in a way where we can mitigate the nrr impacts than get all out for 30 going for it and being done for the rest of the season cause our nrr is to bad to compete

NRR is already bad.
 
This season has just been appalling. Any coach who disappears to do some ultra marathon during the season should be sacked. What does this teach the players?

He told them in the interview he was doing it, and they agreed in May- that's on QC. You can't turn around and sack him.

Boards don't sack Chuck who was a former great, who coached them to two Shield finals and won a BBL 12 months ago to then sack the replacement 12 months later.

Makes them look bad.
 
He told them in the interview he was doing it, and they agreed in May- that's on QC. You can't turn around and sack him.

Boards don't sack Chuck who was a former great, who coached them to two Shield finals and won a BBL 12 months ago to then sack the replacement 12 months later.

Makes them look bad.

I know the way the system works, doesn’t change the fact the decisions were all wrong. Why did they even sack Seccombe? He was going great. Looks like the decision makers need to sack themselves.
 
I know the way the system works, doesn’t change the fact the decisions were all wrong. Why did they even sack Seccombe? He was going great. Looks like the decision makers need to sack themselves.

Doing great? Last and second last in 2/3 competitions never interviews well.
 
He told them in the interview he was doing it, and they agreed in May- that's on QC. You can't turn around and sack him.

Boards don't sack Chuck who was a former great, who coached them to two Shield finals and won a BBL 12 months ago to then sack the replacement 12 months later.

Makes them look bad.
Well the board fucked up and need to be aware that we know they did. Been a pretty dysfuntional unit for a while now
 
I know the way the system works, doesn’t change the fact the decisions were all wrong. Why did they even sack Seccombe? He was going great. Looks like the decision makers need to sack themselves.
Secombe was doing well at BBL level but at Shield and One Day Domestic level we were poor. We probably lack the talent at the moment and didn't really get any development out of some young talented guys.

I wonder when someone is going to make a proper cricketer out of Max Bryant. Clearly talented but lacking Cickt IQ?
 

Active Now

Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.