mrslong said:2006. For Steve Michaels.Jeba said:mrslong said:Darius was terrible. Always out of position. Always always SuRRENDDAAHHHH tackles. Argh. He was dropped for Michaels ffs.
When was he dropped?
Then Steve Michaels did his knee injury & Darius came back.
mrslong said:Remember Darius Boyd? When he came into grade he was attrocious, yet all the coaches & senior players were saying how wonderful he is and blah blah blah. Same thing is happening with Corey Norman, the coaches and everyone is saying how wonderful he is, but we're only catching glimpses of it on the field atm.
Give him some time, he's hardly out of nappies ffs.
Ari Gold said:Norman is a lot the same, but instead of crabbing he butterflies. Butterflies you ask? It's when he gets the ball and does a dainty little dance, like a butterfly.
Bucking Beads said:[quote="Ari Gold":18pvs50n]
Norman is a lot the same, but instead of crabbing he butterflies. Butterflies you ask? It's when he gets the ball and does a dainty little dance, like a butterfly.
Ari Gold said:Which, by the way, is more than you can say about Macca. You get a real dummy half providing real service and Norman might just be able to do a bit more.
Old Mate said:Really rate Norman, despite calls of Hunt being a long term halfback I can see Norman being a better one.
I'm generally in the same camp as you, and despite the fact that I agree that Wallace could make a splendid hooker, I fail to see how Baptiste could fill the halves void, especially after Locky goes...rnabokov said:Norman, talented though he may be, simply looks too fragile at the moment. He needs to seriously toughen up. He looks uncomfortable in the top grade, especially in defence.
Maybe some games at prop? [icon_evillaugh
Baptiste on the other hand, looked very comfortable in the top side, as well as confident. I like that. Prefer him to Norman in the halves. Wallace to 9.
I am now open for flames [icon_lol1.
Porthoz said:I'm generally in the same camp as you, and despite the fact that I agree that Wallace could make a splendid hooker, I fail to see how Baptiste could fill the halves void, especially after Locky goes...rnabokov said:Norman, talented though he may be, simply looks too fragile at the moment. He needs to seriously toughen up. He looks uncomfortable in the top grade, especially in defence.
Maybe some games at prop? [icon_evillaugh
Baptiste on the other hand, looked very comfortable in the top side, as well as confident. I like that. Prefer him to Norman in the halves. Wallace to 9.
I am now open for flames [icon_lol1.
If Baptiste keeps the promise he showed, our focus should turn to the 5/8 position imo.
subsbligh said:Are you blokes watching the same games that I am? And are you on crack suggesting Baptiste, after 2 solid performances as replacement HOOKER is a long term 5/8 option?
Against Melbourne Norman had a decent game, but IMO he is not a long term option and has a poor attitidue (i.e. confidence player..)
subsbligh said:Are you blokes watching the same games that I am? And are you on crack suggesting Baptiste, after 2 solid performances as replacement HOOKER is a long term 5/8 option?
Against Melbourne Norman had a decent game, but IMO he is not a long term option and has a poor attitidue (i.e. confidence player..)
rnabokov said:Yes.
Now pass the crack.