First it was ASADA, then it was Sharpe, now...

CaptainHook

NRL Player
2,921
1,221
I thought it was a bit high on Slater, Pete. The most blatant ones were that shot and the one on Inglis. It just beggars belief that they weren't penalised. I wish Papa was playing tonight to give one to Gal.
 

CaptainHook

NRL Player
2,921
1,221
I'm not sure but wasn't there something about having an ex-player involved as they understood the game better than non-players?

Can't remember fully.
Yes - ironically, the rulings are now more confusing than ever. Referrals for obstruction are basically a "spin the wheel" situation.

I just roll my eyes whenever there is talk of a bunker/war room situation. It's a bit of a joke.

I reckon the solution is pretty simple. Video refs should not be allowed to watch and follow the game. They sit in a darkened room and only see the footage when a decision is referred. That way they can apply a black and white ruling - which would help us get consistency.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create free account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Login or Register

Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Register now

Twitter

Top