Huge
International Rep
Contributor
- Mar 7, 2008
- 13,618
- 10,547
Actually, they weren't going too well if you're being honest. Gamble left a massive hole, try. Mead and the 5/8 Kelly let another one in with neither showing urgency. Our defence was slow off the mark. We weren't going well in defence but our attack helped us balance the scales.This is really my only gripe with your stance/defence.
I agree....how was the rest of the team going? Admittedly up until half time......not too bad. After the break....FMD.
I seriously wonder just what your stance would be if we inserted Milford's name into this discussion..... instead of Isako.
Scrap that....I KNOW what your position is.
Huge: Milford has single handedly cost us every game we lost for the last 2-3 years...end of/
Stop bringing in Milford, it just confuses the issue and isn't relevant. Again, I never maintained that Isaako played well and in fact he was poor. However, the real turning point, the initial claim by JAHHW was the sinbin of Robati. A game we absolutely were in despite Isaako was doomed AFTER Robati reduced us to 12. It's utterly insane to argue that a bad defensive decision or bad ptb was a turning point especially considering we were right in it up to that point.
Something to consider. Imagine Robati doesn't get sent, perhaps we win, who knows?