I am ok with Shane Flanagan as coach. I know he has a bit of a questionable past and people are probably fair in not wanting him near the club, but if he has learnt his lesson and has served his time, I'd rather we land someone like him to turn around the club from what it is currently. He is a proven coach who has tasted success against the other top coaches in the game.
But a slightly off topic question. What's people's opinion on Kyle Flanagan. I don't necessarily think the treatment he has received from the Roosters and from the Dogs has been warranted. I think he played pretty well at the Roosters but he got shafted so that they could bring in Walker.
The reason I ask, is if we bring on Shane Flanagan as coach, would it be worth bringing in Kyle Flanagan to partner Reynolds with the plan of eventually taking over from Reynolds as the chief playmaker. He has a good passing game, a good kicking game, he is cool under pressure, he organises pretty well, and he goal kicks too.
I think the way the club has recruited and planned for the future, we could struggle again once Reynolds retires.