F
Flutterby
International
- Mar 5, 2008
- 5,245
- 1
So Women's Boxing will be in the Olympics in London 2012. The Rugby 7s and Golf will be in for 2016.
What do people think of these sports being included?
For me, I don't follow boxing. My opinion on whether women should compete in it at all is that it is not a sport for women. However each to their own if they choose to compete in boxing so be it. I also think well if they are allowed to do boxing then they should be able to compete in the Olympics as well as the men.
Golf - I do not think that this should be an Olympic Sport. UNLESS only amatuers are allowed to compete. I think the same about Tennis, Basketball and many other sports currently in the Olympics. Basically I think if you are making your living in a professional environment playing that sport then you should be ineligible to compete in the olympics. I like how boxing only allows amatuers in the olympics and in soccer it's an U20s tournament.
I know people will argue that some of the world's best swimmers, athletics and other sports get paid as well - but here is where I make the distinction. In these sports the athletes do not get paid often for their actual sport but rather they get paid from sponsorships and other activities they do. In the likes of golf, tennis, professional basketball etc - these players would still have a more than comfortable living from just their prizemoney and/or match payments even without sponsorships. This is where a distinction should be drawn IMO.
Rugby 7s I don't have a problem with it being in the Olympics (with provisos as per above).
So does anyone else have any thoughts about these sports being added?
What do people think of these sports being included?
For me, I don't follow boxing. My opinion on whether women should compete in it at all is that it is not a sport for women. However each to their own if they choose to compete in boxing so be it. I also think well if they are allowed to do boxing then they should be able to compete in the Olympics as well as the men.
Golf - I do not think that this should be an Olympic Sport. UNLESS only amatuers are allowed to compete. I think the same about Tennis, Basketball and many other sports currently in the Olympics. Basically I think if you are making your living in a professional environment playing that sport then you should be ineligible to compete in the olympics. I like how boxing only allows amatuers in the olympics and in soccer it's an U20s tournament.
I know people will argue that some of the world's best swimmers, athletics and other sports get paid as well - but here is where I make the distinction. In these sports the athletes do not get paid often for their actual sport but rather they get paid from sponsorships and other activities they do. In the likes of golf, tennis, professional basketball etc - these players would still have a more than comfortable living from just their prizemoney and/or match payments even without sponsorships. This is where a distinction should be drawn IMO.
Rugby 7s I don't have a problem with it being in the Olympics (with provisos as per above).
So does anyone else have any thoughts about these sports being added?